Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices Authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2024: Regulatory Characteristics, Predicate Lineage, and Transparency Reporting

<b>Background</b>: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized over 690 machine learning (ML)-enabled medical devices between 1995 and 2023. In 2024, new guidance enabled the inclusion of Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs), raising expectations for transparency, equity, and safety under the Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) framework. <b>Objective</b>: The objective was to assess regulatory pathways, predicate lineage, demographic transparency, performance reporting, and PCCP uptake among ML-enabled devices approved by the FDA in 2024. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all FDA-authorized ML-enabled devices in 2024. Data extracted from FDA summaries included regulatory pathway, predicate genealogy, performance metrics, demographic disclosures, PCCPs, and cybersecurity statements. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used. <b>Results</b>: The FDA authorized 168 ML-enabled Class II devices in 2024. Most (94.6%) were cleared via 510(k); 5.4% were cleared via De Novo. Radiology dominated (74.4%), followed by cardiovascular (6.5%) and neurology (6.0%). Non-US sponsors accounted for 57.7% of clearances. Among 159 510(k) devices, 97.5% cited an identifiable predicate; the median predicate age was 2.2 years (IQR 1.2-4.1), and 64.5% ML-enabled. Predicate reuse remained uncommon (9.9%). Median review time was 162 days (151 days for 510(k) vs. 372 days De Novo; <i>p</i> < 0.001). A total of 49 devices (29.2%) reported both sensitivity and specificity; 15.5% provided demographic data. PCCPs appeared in 16.7% of summaries, and cybersecurity considerations appeared in 54.2%. <b>Conclusions</b>: While 2024 marked a record year for ML-enabled device approvals and internationalization, uptake of PCCPs and transparent performance and demographic reporting remained limited. Policy efforts to standardize disclosures and strengthen post market oversight are critical for realizing the promises of GMLP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedicines
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13123005
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.31
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices Authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2024: Regulatory Characteristics, Predicate Lineage, and Transparency Reporting

Felipe Fregni, Ulrich Grosse, Lucas Antônio dos Santos Barbosa, Bassel Almarie et al.
2 citations
Biomedicines
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
article

Machine Learning-Enabled Medical Devices Authorized by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2024: Regulatory Characteristics, Predicate Lineage, and Transparency Reporting

Felipe Fregni, Ulrich Grosse, Lucas Antônio dos Santos Barbosa, Bassel Almarie, A.M. Lutz, Luis Fernando González-González
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background</b>: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authorized over 690 machine learning (ML)-enabled medical devices between 1995 and 2023. In 2024, new guidance enabled the inclusion of Predetermined Change Control Plans (PCCPs), raising expectations for transparency, equity, and safety under the Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) framework. <b>Objective</b>: The objective was to assess regulatory pathways, predicate lineage, demographic transparency, performance reporting, and PCCP uptake among ML-enabled devices approved by the FDA in 2024. <b>Methods</b>: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of all FDA-authorized ML-enabled devices in 2024. Data extracted from FDA summaries included regulatory pathway, predicate genealogy, performance metrics, demographic disclosures, PCCPs, and cybersecurity statements. Descriptive and nonparametric statistics were used. <b>Results</b>: The FDA authorized 168 ML-enabled Class II devices in 2024. Most (94.6%) were cleared via 510(k); 5.4% were cleared via De Novo. Radiology dominated (74.4%), followed by cardiovascular (6.5%) and neurology (6.0%). Non-US sponsors accounted for 57.7% of clearances. Among 159 510(k) devices, 97.5% cited an identifiable predicate; the median predicate age was 2.2 years (IQR 1.2-4.1), and 64.5% ML-enabled. Predicate reuse remained uncommon (9.9%). Median review time was 162 days (151 days for 510(k) vs. 372 days De Novo; <i>p</i> < 0.001). A total of 49 devices (29.2%) reported both sensitivity and specificity; 15.5% provided demographic data. PCCPs appeared in 16.7% of summaries, and cybersecurity considerations appeared in 54.2%. <b>Conclusions</b>: While 2024 marked a record year for ML-enabled device approvals and internationalization, uptake of PCCPs and transparent performance and demographic reporting remained limited. Policy efforts to standardize disclosures and strengthen post market oversight are critical for realizing the promises of GMLP.

BiomedicinesVol. 13(12)
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital (US), Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (BR), Kantonsspital Frauenfeld (CH), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
1.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.