Learning high-dimensional ionic model dynamics using Fourier Neural Operators

Abstract Ionic models, governed by stiff systems of ordinary differential equations characterized by widely separated timescales that make their numerical integration difficult, are key tools for simulating the dynamics of excitable cells in Computational Neuroscience and Cardiology. Approximating these models with Artificial Neural Networks is challenging due to their stiffness associated with multiple timescales, their nonlinearity and the wide range of dynamical behaviors they exhibit such as multiple equilibria, limit cycles, and intricate interactions. While previous studies focused on predicting transmembrane potential in low-dimensional settings, here we investigate whether Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) can learn the evolution of all state variables in higher-dimensional stiff systems. We evaluate this approach on three representative models of increasing dimensionality: the two-variable FitzHugh–Nagumo model, the four-variable Hodgkin–Huxley model, and the forty-one-variable O’Hara–Rudy model. Beyond accuracy, we examine how system dimensionality affects key performance metrics, including parameter count, training and test errors, memory use, training time, Fourier modes, and network depth. To ensure near-optimal configurations, we performed automatic state-of-the-art hyperparameter tuning in two scenarios: unconstrained and constrained. Both yielded comparable accuracy across all models. These results underline the capabilities of FNOs to accurately capture complex multiscale dynamics, even in high-dimensional dynamical systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Machine learning for computational science and engineering
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s44379-025-00046-8
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.48

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Learning high-dimensional ionic model dynamics using Fourier Neural Operators

Edoardo Centofanti, Luca F. Pavarino, Massimiliano Ghiotto, Luca Pellegrini
1 citations
Machine learning for computational science and engineering
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
2.48
article

Learning high-dimensional ionic model dynamics using Fourier Neural Operators

Edoardo Centofanti, Luca F. Pavarino, Massimiliano Ghiotto, Luca Pellegrini
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Ionic models, governed by stiff systems of ordinary differential equations characterized by widely separated timescales that make their numerical integration difficult, are key tools for simulating the dynamics of excitable cells in Computational Neuroscience and Cardiology. Approximating these models with Artificial Neural Networks is challenging due to their stiffness associated with multiple timescales, their nonlinearity and the wide range of dynamical behaviors they exhibit such as multiple equilibria, limit cycles, and intricate interactions. While previous studies focused on predicting transmembrane potential in low-dimensional settings, here we investigate whether Fourier Neural Operators (FNOs) can learn the evolution of all state variables in higher-dimensional stiff systems. We evaluate this approach on three representative models of increasing dimensionality: the two-variable FitzHugh–Nagumo model, the four-variable Hodgkin–Huxley model, and the forty-one-variable O’Hara–Rudy model. Beyond accuracy, we examine how system dimensionality affects key performance metrics, including parameter count, training and test errors, memory use, training time, Fourier modes, and network depth. To ensure near-optimal configurations, we performed automatic state-of-the-art hyperparameter tuning in two scenarios: unconstrained and constrained. Both yielded comparable accuracy across all models. These results underline the capabilities of FNOs to accurately capture complex multiscale dynamics, even in high-dimensional dynamical systems.

Machine learning for computational science and engineeringVol. 1(2)
University of Pavia (IT), Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
European Commission, Università degli Studi di Pavia
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
2.48
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.