Clinicians’ tolerance for uncertainty and communication about uncertainty with older adults –a standardized patient assessment study

Uncertainty is omnipresent in care for older adults. Resident-physicians may be challenged to manage and communicate about such uncertainty. We aimed to 1) describe how resident-physicians discussed uncertainty with an older adult patient and involved them in decisions; and 2) assess how resident-physicians’ tolerance for uncertainty predicted communication about uncertainty and efforts towards patient involvement. A video-recorded, standardized patient assessment study was conducted involving resident-physicians in internal medicine. Participants conducted online consultations with a standardized geriatric patient. Self-report questionnaires assessed participants’ tolerance for uncertainty, feelings of ambivalence, and satisfaction with communication. Systematic observational coding assessed how residents communicated about uncertainty and involved the patient in decision-making. Descriptive statistics and correlations between observed communication and self-report measures were tested. Residents (N = 37) expressed uncertainty on average 14 times per consultation (range 7–24), most often implicitly (67%). They primarily used information focused approaches (72%, e.g., explaining uncertainty). Emotion-focused approaches were scarcer (21%, e.g., facilitating patients’ coping with uncertainty). Tolerance for uncertainty was relatively high, and unrelated to residents’ uncertainty communication. Residents involved the patient in decision making to an acceptable degree. Patient involvement was not associated with residents’ uncertainty tolerance. Consultations with higher patient involvement included more frequent uncertainty expressions by residents (rp=0.38, p = .02). More solid evidence is needed on the relation between residents’ uncertainty tolerance and communication within care for older adult patients. Research evidence could guide reflective education to support residents in managing uncertainty, as well as skills training to enhance uncertainty communication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-025-06705-y
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinicians’ tolerance for uncertainty and communication about uncertainty with older adults –a standardized patient assessment study

Charlotte Nijskens, Marij A. Hillen, Ellen M.A. Smets, Remco Franssen et al.
BMC Geriatrics
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Clinicians’ tolerance for uncertainty and communication about uncertainty with older adults –a standardized patient assessment study

Charlotte Nijskens, Marij A. Hillen, Ellen M.A. Smets, Remco Franssen, Sharon Wezeman
article en

Abstract

Uncertainty is omnipresent in care for older adults. Resident-physicians may be challenged to manage and communicate about such uncertainty. We aimed to 1) describe how resident-physicians discussed uncertainty with an older adult patient and involved them in decisions; and 2) assess how resident-physicians’ tolerance for uncertainty predicted communication about uncertainty and efforts towards patient involvement. A video-recorded, standardized patient assessment study was conducted involving resident-physicians in internal medicine. Participants conducted online consultations with a standardized geriatric patient. Self-report questionnaires assessed participants’ tolerance for uncertainty, feelings of ambivalence, and satisfaction with communication. Systematic observational coding assessed how residents communicated about uncertainty and involved the patient in decision-making. Descriptive statistics and correlations between observed communication and self-report measures were tested. Residents (N = 37) expressed uncertainty on average 14 times per consultation (range 7–24), most often implicitly (67%). They primarily used information focused approaches (72%, e.g., explaining uncertainty). Emotion-focused approaches were scarcer (21%, e.g., facilitating patients’ coping with uncertainty). Tolerance for uncertainty was relatively high, and unrelated to residents’ uncertainty communication. Residents involved the patient in decision making to an acceptable degree. Patient involvement was not associated with residents’ uncertainty tolerance. Consultations with higher patient involvement included more frequent uncertainty expressions by residents (rp=0.38, p = .02). More solid evidence is needed on the relation between residents’ uncertainty tolerance and communication within care for older adult patients. Research evidence could guide reflective education to support residents in managing uncertainty, as well as skills training to enhance uncertainty communication.

BMC GeriatricsVol. 26(1)
GGD Amsterdam (NL), Public Health Service of Amsterdam (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.