Expected effects of a global transformation of agricultural pest management

Ambitious policy goals to reduce pesticide use and risks have been established at global and regional levels. Here, we provide an assessment of the expected effects of such a global transformation of agricultural pest management. We develop a holistic assessment framework covering economic, human health, food security, social, and environmental effects and conduct a global survey with 517 experts from key disciplines and major agricultural production regions. This is an important step to identify leverage points for advancing pesticide policies and focusing future research efforts. Our results demonstrate that transforming agricultural pest management could be an important nexus for addressing multiple sustainability challenges. We find the highest expected benefits for the environmental and human health domains and the lowest for the economic and food safety domains. For regions with low income and low pesticide use, we find higher benefits and less trade-offs of the transformation than for intensive production systems in Europe and North America. Finally, a transformation is not free of costs and our results indicate that it will require a combination of new and locally adapted pest management solutions, research and support for their implementation on the ground, and an enabling policy environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66982-4
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expected effects of a global transformation of agricultural pest management

Anna Rafaela Cavalcante Braga, Robert Finger, Pepijn Schreinemachers, Vesna Gagić et al.
6 citations
Nature Communications
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
10.50
article

Expected effects of a global transformation of agricultural pest management

Anna Rafaela Cavalcante Braga, Robert Finger, Pepijn Schreinemachers, Vesna Gagić, Wim DE VRIES, Malick N. Ba, Matin Qaim, Sabrina Gaba, Per Kudsk, U. Niggli, Robin Mesnage, Christian Stamm, Niklas Möhring, Ashley Larsen
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Ambitious policy goals to reduce pesticide use and risks have been established at global and regional levels. Here, we provide an assessment of the expected effects of such a global transformation of agricultural pest management. We develop a holistic assessment framework covering economic, human health, food security, social, and environmental effects and conduct a global survey with 517 experts from key disciplines and major agricultural production regions. This is an important step to identify leverage points for advancing pesticide policies and focusing future research efforts. Our results demonstrate that transforming agricultural pest management could be an important nexus for addressing multiple sustainability challenges. We find the highest expected benefits for the environmental and human health domains and the lowest for the economic and food safety domains. For regions with low income and low pesticide use, we find higher benefits and less trade-offs of the transformation than for intensive production systems in Europe and North America. Finally, a transformation is not free of costs and our results indicate that it will require a combination of new and locally adapted pest management solutions, research and support for their implementation on the ground, and an enabling policy environment.

Nature CommunicationsVol. 16(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Bonn (DE), University of California, Santa Barbara (US), King's College - North Carolina (US), King's College London (GB), Aarhus University (DK), ETH Zurich (CH), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Centre d'Etudes Biologiques de Chizé (FR), Department of Primary Industries (AU), Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (CH), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
National Science Foundation, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity
10.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.