Managing Upward and Downward Accountability Through Strategic Ambidexterity in an INGO Setting

Drawing on data from a 2.5-year field case study, this research examines how an International Non-Government Organization (DevCo) uses ambidexterity to manage the tensions between upward and downward accountability. Using the theoretical lens of organizational ambidexterity, particularly the explore-exploit paradox, and utilizing Miles and Snow’s adaptive cycle, we analyze how DevCo optimized existing systems to strengthen donor reporting and upward accountability. At the same time, we unearth how DevCo fostered downward accountability by building new relationships with local non-governmental organizations and recipient communities. Using the explore-exploit paradox, we highlight how DevCo’s ambidextrous capabilities were seen to be mutually supportive as opposed to being mutually exclusive. This case study also shows how ambidexterity enabled DevCo to effectively manage the diverse array of stakeholders to whom they are accountable. These findings are discussed from both a practical and theoretical perspective.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08997640251396026
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Managing Upward and Downward Accountability Through Strategic Ambidexterity in an INGO Setting

John Walsh, Elaine Berkery, John Lannon
Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
International Development and Aid
article

Managing Upward and Downward Accountability Through Strategic Ambidexterity in an INGO Setting

John Walsh, Elaine Berkery, John Lannon
article en

Abstract

Drawing on data from a 2.5-year field case study, this research examines how an International Non-Government Organization (DevCo) uses ambidexterity to manage the tensions between upward and downward accountability. Using the theoretical lens of organizational ambidexterity, particularly the explore-exploit paradox, and utilizing Miles and Snow’s adaptive cycle, we analyze how DevCo optimized existing systems to strengthen donor reporting and upward accountability. At the same time, we unearth how DevCo fostered downward accountability by building new relationships with local non-governmental organizations and recipient communities. Using the explore-exploit paradox, we highlight how DevCo’s ambidextrous capabilities were seen to be mutually supportive as opposed to being mutually exclusive. This case study also shows how ambidexterity enabled DevCo to effectively manage the diverse array of stakeholders to whom they are accountable. These findings are discussed from both a practical and theoretical perspective.

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
University of Limerick (IE), Doras Luimní (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.