Quantifying Difficulty in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery—A Modified Delphi Method Approach

ImportanceSurgical difficulty quantification is crucial to develop educational curricula for progressive training. This need remains unmet in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES).ObjectiveThe objective was to classify the basic skills and procedures of EES according to the perceived difficulty by experts to build a progressive curriculum.DesignThree-round modified Delphi study.SettingE-survey with an international panel of EES experts.ParticipantsFifty-nine international experts were selected on their publications in the field of EES and medical education and invited to participate. Fifteen experts from 5 countries completed the survey.InterventionA 3-round modified Delphi study was conducted.Main Outcome MeasuresIn round#1, basic skills and EES procedures were identified and the basic skills required for these procedures were listed. In round#2, the expert panel ranked the difficulty of basic skills, and in round#3, the difficulty of the EES procedures. The basic skills were grouped into 3 categories of increasing difficulty, and the subsequently-calculated difficulty of each EES procedure was compared with the experts' score. Consensus was defined at ≥80% agreement.ResultsTwenty-three basic skills and 26 EES procedures were identified. Basic skills were ranked in 3 groups of increasing difficulty, from easiest (navigation with a 0° telescope) to most difficult (suturing in the nasal cavity), with ≥80% agreement. The least difficult procedure ranked was polypectomy, whereas the most difficult was Vidian neurectomy. The correlation between the expert score and the calculated score reached an R<sup>2</sup> of .75, reflecting the cumulative effect of these required competencies on procedure difficulty.ConclusionsConsensus was achieved to rank basic skills and EES procedure according to the perceived difficulty by experts.RelevanceThis study provides a basis for quantifying surgical difficulty in EES and pave the way for developing a progressive educational curriculum.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216251390285
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Difficulty in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery—A Modified Delphi Method Approach

Marc A. Tewfik, Lily H. P. Nguyen, Valentin Favier, P. Gallet et al.
Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Quantifying Difficulty in Endoscopic Endonasal Surgery—A Modified Delphi Method Approach

Marc A. Tewfik, Lily H. P. Nguyen, Valentin Favier, P. Gallet, C. Rumeau
article en

Abstract

ImportanceSurgical difficulty quantification is crucial to develop educational curricula for progressive training. This need remains unmet in endoscopic endonasal surgery (EES).ObjectiveThe objective was to classify the basic skills and procedures of EES according to the perceived difficulty by experts to build a progressive curriculum.DesignThree-round modified Delphi study.SettingE-survey with an international panel of EES experts.ParticipantsFifty-nine international experts were selected on their publications in the field of EES and medical education and invited to participate. Fifteen experts from 5 countries completed the survey.InterventionA 3-round modified Delphi study was conducted.Main Outcome MeasuresIn round#1, basic skills and EES procedures were identified and the basic skills required for these procedures were listed. In round#2, the expert panel ranked the difficulty of basic skills, and in round#3, the difficulty of the EES procedures. The basic skills were grouped into 3 categories of increasing difficulty, and the subsequently-calculated difficulty of each EES procedure was compared with the experts' score. Consensus was defined at ≥80% agreement.ResultsTwenty-three basic skills and 26 EES procedures were identified. Basic skills were ranked in 3 groups of increasing difficulty, from easiest (navigation with a 0° telescope) to most difficult (suturing in the nasal cavity), with ≥80% agreement. The least difficult procedure ranked was polypectomy, whereas the most difficult was Vidian neurectomy. The correlation between the expert score and the calculated score reached an R<sup>2</sup> of .75, reflecting the cumulative effect of these required competencies on procedure difficulty.ConclusionsConsensus was achieved to rank basic skills and EES procedure according to the perceived difficulty by experts.RelevanceThis study provides a basis for quantifying surgical difficulty in EES and pave the way for developing a progressive educational curriculum.

Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck SurgeryVol. 54
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Nancy (FR), Laboratoire d'Informatique, de Robotique et de Microélectronique de Montpellier (FR), Hôpital Gui de Chauliac (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 42%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.