Preventing postoperative deterioration: The promise of wearable biosensors in rural settings

Postoperative deterioration remains a challenge, particularly in rural and remote hospitals. Early recognition of complications is critical, yet intermittent ward monitoring may fail to detect subtle physiological changes. Wearable biosensors offer a promising strategy to extend high-dependency surveillance beyond intensive care. These devices can provide continuous, real-time monitoring, enabling earlier intervention, supporting clinical decision-making, and reducing reliance on limited rural health care staff. Evidence suggests these devices are feasible and well tolerated. This viewpoint examines their potential to enhance postoperative surveillance in resource-limited settings and highlights the need for targeted evaluation in rural Australian hospitals to assess effectiveness, cost-benefit, and integration into perioperative practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Perioperative Practice
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589251401167
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preventing postoperative deterioration: The promise of wearable biosensors in rural settings

Georgina Lewis, Brandon Stretton, James Andrews, C. Van der Westhuizen et al.
Journal of Perioperative Practice
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Preventing postoperative deterioration: The promise of wearable biosensors in rural settings

Georgina Lewis, Brandon Stretton, James Andrews, C. Van der Westhuizen, Christina Gao, Alasdair Leslie
article en

Abstract

Postoperative deterioration remains a challenge, particularly in rural and remote hospitals. Early recognition of complications is critical, yet intermittent ward monitoring may fail to detect subtle physiological changes. Wearable biosensors offer a promising strategy to extend high-dependency surveillance beyond intensive care. These devices can provide continuous, real-time monitoring, enabling earlier intervention, supporting clinical decision-making, and reducing reliance on limited rural health care staff. Evidence suggests these devices are feasible and well tolerated. This viewpoint examines their potential to enhance postoperative surveillance in resource-limited settings and highlights the need for targeted evaluation in rural Australian hospitals to assess effectiveness, cost-benefit, and integration into perioperative practice.

Journal of Perioperative Practice
Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU), Flinders University (AU), Mount Medical Centre (AU), The University of Adelaide (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Preventing postoperative deterioration: The promise of wearable biosensors in rural settings — Georgina Lewis, Brandon Stretton, et al. · Journal of Perioperative Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS