Consumer preferences for higher welfare and sustainability labelled pig meat in Ireland and the United Kingdom

Purpose Consumers are more conscious of how their food is produced and are concerned about farm animal welfare. This study explores the importance pig meat consumers placed on assurance labels, price and product type. Design/methodology/approach An orthogonal array of nine conceptual products were included in an online survey. Irish (n = 387) and UK (n = 379) consumers rated how likely they would be to purchase each product. Conjoint analysis was performed to estimate the utility and importance of the attributes. Consumer clusters were generated using combined utility estimates for the UK and Ireland. Findings Three consumer clusters were identified; “indifferent” (68%), “like labels” (23%) and “pro pig welfare” (9%) consumers. The clusters were further characterised using other constructs from the survey. “Like labels” and “pro pig welfare” clusters considered welfare to be more of a priority, had a higher “behavioural intention” to purchase higher welfare pig meat products, and had more “knowledge” of pig production. Moreover, consumers in the “like labels” cluster were less likely to perceive any budgetary constraints for purchasing higher welfare products and “pro pig welfare” consumers had a small positive utility for the price attribute. Originality/value These findings indicate a market for higher welfare and potentially other production-related labels on pig meat products in Ireland, where no such scheme currently exists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Food Journal
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/bfj-01-2025-0018
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Consumer preferences for higher welfare and sustainability labelled pig meat in Ireland and the United Kingdom

Niamh Elizabeth O’Connell, Keelin O’Driscoll, Sinéad N. McCarthy, Mary N. Harrison
British Food Journal
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Consumer preferences for higher welfare and sustainability labelled pig meat in Ireland and the United Kingdom

Niamh Elizabeth O’Connell, Keelin O’Driscoll, Sinéad N. McCarthy, Mary N. Harrison
article en

Abstract

Purpose Consumers are more conscious of how their food is produced and are concerned about farm animal welfare. This study explores the importance pig meat consumers placed on assurance labels, price and product type. Design/methodology/approach An orthogonal array of nine conceptual products were included in an online survey. Irish (n = 387) and UK (n = 379) consumers rated how likely they would be to purchase each product. Conjoint analysis was performed to estimate the utility and importance of the attributes. Consumer clusters were generated using combined utility estimates for the UK and Ireland. Findings Three consumer clusters were identified; “indifferent” (68%), “like labels” (23%) and “pro pig welfare” (9%) consumers. The clusters were further characterised using other constructs from the survey. “Like labels” and “pro pig welfare” clusters considered welfare to be more of a priority, had a higher “behavioural intention” to purchase higher welfare pig meat products, and had more “knowledge” of pig production. Moreover, consumers in the “like labels” cluster were less likely to perceive any budgetary constraints for purchasing higher welfare products and “pro pig welfare” consumers had a small positive utility for the price attribute. Originality/value These findings indicate a market for higher welfare and potentially other production-related labels on pig meat products in Ireland, where no such scheme currently exists.

British Food JournalVol. 127(13)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.