Early Speech Development in Romanian Children with Cochlear Implants Assessed Using the LittlEARS® Early Speech Production Questionnaire (LEESPQ)

<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity, clinical applicability, and developmental sensitivity of the Romanian LEESPQ in children with cochlear implants (CIs), by analyzing its association with age at implantation, duration of auditory experience, and implantation laterality, and by comparing the developmental trajectory with that of normal-hearing (NH) children. <b>Methods:</b> The study assesses the validity, reliability, and clinical sensitivity of the LEESPQ in pediatric cochlear implant users. Furthermore, it investigates the associations between total questionnaire scores and key clinical variables, including implantation laterality (unilateral versus bilateral), age at device activation, and duration of implant use. Forty-seven children with CIs (26 boys, 21 girls) were included, with implantation ages ranging from 9 months to 5 years. Of these, 21 received unilateral implants and 26 bilateral implants. Responses were analyzed both in relation to clinical variables and in comparison with available normative data from NH children, in order to delineate potential differences in linguistic developmental trajectories. <b>Results:</b> Findings suggest that the LEESPQ is a reliable and clinically valuable instrument for monitoring post-implant linguistic progress. It provides relevant insights into early auditory access, the linguistic environment within the family, and the development of early verbal production. Scores were significantly influenced by age at implantation and duration of auditory experience, confirming the role of early stimulation and neural plasticity in shaping speech development after cochlear implantation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The LEESPQ demonstrates strong clinical utility as a sensitive tool for monitoring early preverbal and verbal development in children with CIs. By capturing score variations associated with age at implantation, auditory experience, and implantation laterality, the questionnaire provides meaningful insights into early post-implant outcomes and supports individualized rehabilitation planning. These findings highlight the value of the LEESPQ for early outcome assessment in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Audiology Research
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15060172
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early Speech Development in Romanian Children with Cochlear Implants Assessed Using the LittlEARS® Early Speech Production Questionnaire (LEESPQ)

Cristian Mârțu, Luminiţa Rădulescu, Sebastian Cozma, Cristian Mircea Neagoș et al.
1 citations
Audiology Research
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
article

Early Speech Development in Romanian Children with Cochlear Implants Assessed Using the LittlEARS® Early Speech Production Questionnaire (LEESPQ)

Cristian Mârțu, Luminiţa Rădulescu, Sebastian Cozma, Cristian Mircea Neagoș, Raluca Olariu, Violeta Necula, Corina Butnaru, A. Ivanov, Petronela Moraru
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> The aim of the study was to evaluate the validity, clinical applicability, and developmental sensitivity of the Romanian LEESPQ in children with cochlear implants (CIs), by analyzing its association with age at implantation, duration of auditory experience, and implantation laterality, and by comparing the developmental trajectory with that of normal-hearing (NH) children. <b>Methods:</b> The study assesses the validity, reliability, and clinical sensitivity of the LEESPQ in pediatric cochlear implant users. Furthermore, it investigates the associations between total questionnaire scores and key clinical variables, including implantation laterality (unilateral versus bilateral), age at device activation, and duration of implant use. Forty-seven children with CIs (26 boys, 21 girls) were included, with implantation ages ranging from 9 months to 5 years. Of these, 21 received unilateral implants and 26 bilateral implants. Responses were analyzed both in relation to clinical variables and in comparison with available normative data from NH children, in order to delineate potential differences in linguistic developmental trajectories. <b>Results:</b> Findings suggest that the LEESPQ is a reliable and clinically valuable instrument for monitoring post-implant linguistic progress. It provides relevant insights into early auditory access, the linguistic environment within the family, and the development of early verbal production. Scores were significantly influenced by age at implantation and duration of auditory experience, confirming the role of early stimulation and neural plasticity in shaping speech development after cochlear implantation. <b>Conclusions:</b> The LEESPQ demonstrates strong clinical utility as a sensitive tool for monitoring early preverbal and verbal development in children with CIs. By capturing score variations associated with age at implantation, auditory experience, and implantation laterality, the questionnaire provides meaningful insights into early post-implant outcomes and supports individualized rehabilitation planning. These findings highlight the value of the LEESPQ for early outcome assessment in pediatric cochlear implant users.

Audiology ResearchVol. 15(6)
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Grigore T. Popa University of Medicine and Pharmacy (RO), Universitatea de Medicină, Farmacie, Științe și Tehnologie „George Emil Palade” din Târgu Mureș (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.