Community-based nursing strategies for optimizing public health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Community-based nursing (CBN) initiatives are being acknowledged widely as a necessary means of infusing preventive and chronic healthcare services into environments outside of hospitals. Nevertheless, the proof that is already available is still very much pieced together, and the size of their impact that can be measured on public health is not very evident. The main purpose of this research was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of how effective nursing interventions in a community setting are for the three areas of health promotion, disease prevention, and chronic-disease management, regardless of the population or the context. The search for systematic reviews of studies in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science was narrowed down to the window between January 2000 and September 2025. The studies that were eligible for inclusion were those of randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and cohort designs that compared community nurse-led interventions with the usual or no care. The assembled information was analyzed through a random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian–Laird model). The results were presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was determined with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and the level of evidence was judged by GRADE. In total, 20 studies (n = 14,386 participants) were found to be eligible for inclusion criteria. The combined data analysis showed that the overall effect was moderate (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.75, p < 0.001) and was in favor of CBN interventions. Subgroup analyses revealed that self-management behavior (SMD = 0.68), quality of life (SMD = 0.57), and patient satisfaction (SMD = 0.73) were significantly improved, while healthcare utilization was moderately reduced (SMD = − 0.42). The heterogeneity was at a moderate level (I² = 61%), however, the results of the sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were not affected by this and therefore, they still stand. The quality of the evidence was rated as being from moderate to high for different outcomes. Community-based nursing interventions yield consistent, statistically significant benefits for health behavior, quality of life, and service utilization. While causal inference is limited by mixed study designs and moderate heterogeneity, the evidence supports their integration into primary-care and public-health strategies. These interventions may be considered context-appropriate tools for optimizing population health outcomes through sustained, nurse-led community engagement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Public Health
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12982-025-01166-5
Primary Topic
Nursing Roles and Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Community-based nursing strategies for optimizing public health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ravi Yadav, Debasrita Banerjee
Discover Public Health
Nursing Roles and Practices
article

Community-based nursing strategies for optimizing public health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Ravi Yadav, Debasrita Banerjee
article en

Abstract

Community-based nursing (CBN) initiatives are being acknowledged widely as a necessary means of infusing preventive and chronic healthcare services into environments outside of hospitals. Nevertheless, the proof that is already available is still very much pieced together, and the size of their impact that can be measured on public health is not very evident. The main purpose of this research was to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of how effective nursing interventions in a community setting are for the three areas of health promotion, disease prevention, and chronic-disease management, regardless of the population or the context. The search for systematic reviews of studies in PubMed, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science was narrowed down to the window between January 2000 and September 2025. The studies that were eligible for inclusion were those of randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental, and cohort designs that compared community nurse-led interventions with the usual or no care. The assembled information was analyzed through a random-effects meta-analysis (DerSimonian–Laird model). The results were presented as standardized mean differences (SMDs) or risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The risk of bias was determined with RoB 2 and ROBINS-I, and the level of evidence was judged by GRADE. In total, 20 studies (n = 14,386 participants) were found to be eligible for inclusion criteria. The combined data analysis showed that the overall effect was moderate (SMD = 0.54, 95% CI 0.32–0.75, p < 0.001) and was in favor of CBN interventions. Subgroup analyses revealed that self-management behavior (SMD = 0.68), quality of life (SMD = 0.57), and patient satisfaction (SMD = 0.73) were significantly improved, while healthcare utilization was moderately reduced (SMD = − 0.42). The heterogeneity was at a moderate level (I² = 61%), however, the results of the sensitivity and meta-regression analyses were not affected by this and therefore, they still stand. The quality of the evidence was rated as being from moderate to high for different outcomes. Community-based nursing interventions yield consistent, statistically significant benefits for health behavior, quality of life, and service utilization. While causal inference is limited by mixed study designs and moderate heterogeneity, the evidence supports their integration into primary-care and public-health strategies. These interventions may be considered context-appropriate tools for optimizing population health outcomes through sustained, nurse-led community engagement.

Discover Public HealthVol. 22(1)
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US), University of Technology and Management (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Nursing Roles and Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.