Impact of orthodontic treatment on nasolabial fold: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose Recently, there is a paradigm shift towards prioritizing soft tissue aesthetics over dental occlusion in orthodontic treatments. This modern approach in orthodontics emphasizes not only dental alignment but also the potential impact of treatments on facial soft tissues, including the nasolabial fold (NLF). The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate any alterations occurring in the NLF due to orthodontic treatments.Methods and Materials In this meta-analysis, a search of the literature was conducted in Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data extraction involved patient characteristics, study design, treatment modality, and NLF measurements. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS checklist. The extracted data underwent meta-analysis using random-effects model.Results Out of a total of 800 articles retrieved, 7 met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled. Meta-analysis of three studies showed a statistically significant difference in NLF changes between extraction and non-extraction treatments (MD = 0.27 [95%CI = 0.01, 0.54], p = 0.01). Four other studies were systematically reviewed. Risk of bias analysis identified studies with a moderate to critical risk of bias. The reviewed studies all showed that orthodontic treatment has a significant effect on NLF position and shape.Conclusion Orthodontic extraction treatment plan can change the position of NLF posteriorly by 0.27 mm, which although found to be statistically significant, probably has little clinical impact. Some different factors including anchorage, incisor retraction, patient age, and skin elasticity contribute to NLF changes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical and Investigative Orthodontics
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/27705781.2025.2600694
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of orthodontic treatment on nasolabial fold: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Erfan Bardideh, Pegah Sadeghnezhad, Pouria Soltaninezhad, Neda Eslami
1 citations
Clinical and Investigative Orthodontics
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
1.68
article

Impact of orthodontic treatment on nasolabial fold: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Erfan Bardideh, Pegah Sadeghnezhad, Pouria Soltaninezhad, Neda Eslami
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose Recently, there is a paradigm shift towards prioritizing soft tissue aesthetics over dental occlusion in orthodontic treatments. This modern approach in orthodontics emphasizes not only dental alignment but also the potential impact of treatments on facial soft tissues, including the nasolabial fold (NLF). The aim of this meta-analysis was to investigate any alterations occurring in the NLF due to orthodontic treatments.Methods and Materials In this meta-analysis, a search of the literature was conducted in Medline, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Data extraction involved patient characteristics, study design, treatment modality, and NLF measurements. Risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS checklist. The extracted data underwent meta-analysis using random-effects model.Results Out of a total of 800 articles retrieved, 7 met the eligibility criteria and were enrolled. Meta-analysis of three studies showed a statistically significant difference in NLF changes between extraction and non-extraction treatments (MD = 0.27 [95%CI = 0.01, 0.54], p = 0.01). Four other studies were systematically reviewed. Risk of bias analysis identified studies with a moderate to critical risk of bias. The reviewed studies all showed that orthodontic treatment has a significant effect on NLF position and shape.Conclusion Orthodontic extraction treatment plan can change the position of NLF posteriorly by 0.27 mm, which although found to be statistically significant, probably has little clinical impact. Some different factors including anchorage, incisor retraction, patient age, and skin elasticity contribute to NLF changes.

Clinical and Investigative Orthodontics
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences (IR), Sabzevar University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
1.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Impact of orthodontic treatment on nasolabial fold: a systematic review and meta-analysis — Erfan Bardideh, Pegah Sadeghnezhad, et al. · Clinical and Investigative Orthodontics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS