Microbial Diversity of the Surface of Polypropylene and Low Density Polyethylene‐Based Materials (Plastisphere) From an Area Subjected to Intensive Agriculture

Accumulation of synthetic plastics in the biosphere has led to global pollution, provoking serious consequences for the environment and human health. Uncontrolled agricultural plastic landfills have the risk of becoming a source of agrochemicals and microplastics. Biotechnological approaches to solve plastic pollution include the removal of these polymers through biological degradation, which is a friendly environmental method. The microbial communities colonizing plastic debris (plastisphere) are considered as a potential source of plastic-degrading microorganisms. In this study, a bacterial biodiversity analysis, based on 16S rRNA gene-targeted metagenomic sequencing, was achieved in the plastisphere of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and polypropylene (PP) polymers from an agricultural landfill. The α-diversity analysis did not show significant differences between LDPE and PP plastispheres and the plastic-free bulk soil, while LDPE and PP bacterial communities clustered close, but separately from the bulk soil in a β-diversity analysis. Although the taxonomic composition of both plastispheres was different, they shared a significantly higher proportion of Cyanobacteria and Deinococcota than the bulk soil. Additional analyses showed different indicator families, genera and species that can be associated with plastispheres. A predictive functional analysis suggests that degradation of plastic additives in both plastispheres is probably occurring. In addition, the existence of degradation processes for specific herbicides in each plastisphere is highlighted, and the possible exposure of LDPE to both physical and biological degradation processes is also described. These results will contribute to characterize the soil plastisphere exposed to different environmental conditions, and to understand the specific biological niches where plastic-degrading microorganisms could survive.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MicrobiologyOpen
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.70121
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Microbial Diversity of the Surface of Polypropylene and Low Density Polyethylene‐Based Materials (Plastisphere) From an Area Subjected to Intensive Agriculture

María Dolores Roldán, Víctor M. Luque‐Almagro, Alfonso Olaya‐Abril, Lara P. Sáez et al.
1 citations
MicrobiologyOpen
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
article

Microbial Diversity of the Surface of Polypropylene and Low Density Polyethylene‐Based Materials (Plastisphere) From an Area Subjected to Intensive Agriculture

María Dolores Roldán, Víctor M. Luque‐Almagro, Alfonso Olaya‐Abril, Lara P. Sáez, Frutos C. Marhuenda‐Egea, Daniel Becerra, G. Rodríguez-Caballero, Conrado Moreno‐Vivián
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Accumulation of synthetic plastics in the biosphere has led to global pollution, provoking serious consequences for the environment and human health. Uncontrolled agricultural plastic landfills have the risk of becoming a source of agrochemicals and microplastics. Biotechnological approaches to solve plastic pollution include the removal of these polymers through biological degradation, which is a friendly environmental method. The microbial communities colonizing plastic debris (plastisphere) are considered as a potential source of plastic-degrading microorganisms. In this study, a bacterial biodiversity analysis, based on 16S rRNA gene-targeted metagenomic sequencing, was achieved in the plastisphere of low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and polypropylene (PP) polymers from an agricultural landfill. The α-diversity analysis did not show significant differences between LDPE and PP plastispheres and the plastic-free bulk soil, while LDPE and PP bacterial communities clustered close, but separately from the bulk soil in a β-diversity analysis. Although the taxonomic composition of both plastispheres was different, they shared a significantly higher proportion of Cyanobacteria and Deinococcota than the bulk soil. Additional analyses showed different indicator families, genera and species that can be associated with plastispheres. A predictive functional analysis suggests that degradation of plastic additives in both plastispheres is probably occurring. In addition, the existence of degradation processes for specific herbicides in each plastisphere is highlighted, and the possible exposure of LDPE to both physical and biological degradation processes is also described. These results will contribute to characterize the soil plastisphere exposed to different environmental conditions, and to understand the specific biological niches where plastic-degrading microorganisms could survive.

MicrobiologyOpenVol. 14(6)
University of Alicante (ES), University of Córdoba (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
0.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.