Optimizing lightweight geopolymer concrete mixes

Abstract The development of geopolymer concrete is advancing rapidly worldwide. However, issues related to workability and setting time in geopolymer mixes, compared to traditional concrete mixtures, remain a challenge. These problems could be particularly concerning if geopolymer is used for masonry applications. The short setting time and rapid hardening may enhance the production rate of masonry units but require careful consideration to ensure practicality and quality control. This study examines the performance of lightweight geopolymer concrete (LWGPC) as an alternative to traditional lightweight concrete to be used in masonry unit’s production. The investigation focuses on the effects of free water, foaming agent content, and foam stabilizer on the mechanical and physical properties of LWGPC. Experimental results indicate that reducing the free water content increased the dry density from approximately 810 kg/m³ to 1030 kg/m³ and enhanced the compressive strength from 3.25 MPa to 5.61 MPa after 28 days. Conversely, increasing the foaming agent content decreased the dry density from 1024 kg/m³ to 680 kg/m³, accompanied by a reduction in compressive strength from 5.52 MPa to 2.28 MPa. The inclusion of foam stabilizer slightly reduced density (by up to 7%) and caused compressive-strength reductions ranging from a 4% to 42% within the tested mixes, increasing with foaming-agent content. These findings highlight the trade-offs between density, strength, and workability, offering valuable insights for optimizing LWGPC for masonry used in structural applications, and insulation purposes. Within the tested range, intermediate foaming-agent dosages (around 60–80 kg/m³) yielded the highest specific compressive strength, depending on stabilizer content. Additionally, a new set of equations was proposed to predict the compressive strength and dry density of lightweight foamed geopolymer concrete, with strong correlation to experimental results (R² = 0.93 for compressive strength and R² = 0.96 for dry density).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-025-00828-0
Primary Topic
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing lightweight geopolymer concrete mixes

Hesham Sokairge, Mohamed Ibrahim, Hany Elshafie, Ayman Shamesldein
Journal of Engineering and Applied Science
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
article

Optimizing lightweight geopolymer concrete mixes

Hesham Sokairge, Mohamed Ibrahim, Hany Elshafie, Ayman Shamesldein
article en

Abstract

Abstract The development of geopolymer concrete is advancing rapidly worldwide. However, issues related to workability and setting time in geopolymer mixes, compared to traditional concrete mixtures, remain a challenge. These problems could be particularly concerning if geopolymer is used for masonry applications. The short setting time and rapid hardening may enhance the production rate of masonry units but require careful consideration to ensure practicality and quality control. This study examines the performance of lightweight geopolymer concrete (LWGPC) as an alternative to traditional lightweight concrete to be used in masonry unit’s production. The investigation focuses on the effects of free water, foaming agent content, and foam stabilizer on the mechanical and physical properties of LWGPC. Experimental results indicate that reducing the free water content increased the dry density from approximately 810 kg/m³ to 1030 kg/m³ and enhanced the compressive strength from 3.25 MPa to 5.61 MPa after 28 days. Conversely, increasing the foaming agent content decreased the dry density from 1024 kg/m³ to 680 kg/m³, accompanied by a reduction in compressive strength from 5.52 MPa to 2.28 MPa. The inclusion of foam stabilizer slightly reduced density (by up to 7%) and caused compressive-strength reductions ranging from a 4% to 42% within the tested mixes, increasing with foaming-agent content. These findings highlight the trade-offs between density, strength, and workability, offering valuable insights for optimizing LWGPC for masonry used in structural applications, and insulation purposes. Within the tested range, intermediate foaming-agent dosages (around 60–80 kg/m³) yielded the highest specific compressive strength, depending on stabilizer content. Additionally, a new set of equations was proposed to predict the compressive strength and dry density of lightweight foamed geopolymer concrete, with strong correlation to experimental results (R² = 0.93 for compressive strength and R² = 0.96 for dry density).

Journal of Engineering and Applied ScienceVol. 72(1)
Ain Shams University (EG)
Ain Shams University
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.