Comparative investigation on the ballistic impact resistance of GFRP and CFRP laminates

In the research, the ballistic limit, dynamic response, damage, and energy absorption of glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates under high-speed fragment impact were comprehensively investigated. High-speed impact tests were conducted using a 14.5 mm ballistic gun to launch tungsten alloy fragment on GFRP and CFRP laminates. Additionally, a finite element (FE) model was developed to analyse the penetration, deformation, and damage of the composite laminates under ballistic impact. Based on the Lambert-Jonas equation, the ballistic limits of 8 mm thick GFRP and CFRP laminates were determined to be 517 m/s and 710 m/s, respectively. In the impact process simulated by the FE model, CFRP demonstrated superior resistance compared to GFRP in preventing projectile penetration. Additionally, the damage behaviour of GFRP was characterized by the separation of fibres and matrix, whereas CFRP exhibited a more brittle fracture mode. Finally, the energy absorption capabilities of CFRP were compared with those of GFRP. The results indicated that the ballistic impact resistance of CFRP was superior to that of GFRP. However, it was noteworthy that this advantage diminished as the impact velocity increased. This study provides valuable insights for ballistic impact resistance of GFRP and CFRP structures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07316844251407223
Primary Topic
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative investigation on the ballistic impact resistance of GFRP and CFRP laminates

Junan Wu, Changfa Chen, Hao Cui, Hao Zhou et al.
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
article

Comparative investigation on the ballistic impact resistance of GFRP and CFRP laminates

Junan Wu, Changfa Chen, Hao Cui, Hao Zhou, Rui Guo
article en

Abstract

In the research, the ballistic limit, dynamic response, damage, and energy absorption of glass fibre-reinforced polymer (GFRP) and carbon fibre-reinforced polymer (CFRP) laminates under high-speed fragment impact were comprehensively investigated. High-speed impact tests were conducted using a 14.5 mm ballistic gun to launch tungsten alloy fragment on GFRP and CFRP laminates. Additionally, a finite element (FE) model was developed to analyse the penetration, deformation, and damage of the composite laminates under ballistic impact. Based on the Lambert-Jonas equation, the ballistic limits of 8 mm thick GFRP and CFRP laminates were determined to be 517 m/s and 710 m/s, respectively. In the impact process simulated by the FE model, CFRP demonstrated superior resistance compared to GFRP in preventing projectile penetration. Additionally, the damage behaviour of GFRP was characterized by the separation of fibres and matrix, whereas CFRP exhibited a more brittle fracture mode. Finally, the energy absorption capabilities of CFRP were compared with those of GFRP. The results indicated that the ballistic impact resistance of CFRP was superior to that of GFRP. However, it was noteworthy that this advantage diminished as the impact velocity increased. This study provides valuable insights for ballistic impact resistance of GFRP and CFRP structures.

Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
Nanjing University of Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Mechanical Behavior of Composites
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.