294 Preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making among patients with a migration background in Belgium: a focus group study

Abstract OP 12: Health Services 4, B210 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 17:00 - 18:00 Aim This study aims to broadly explore the preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making (MDM) among patients with a migration background in Belgium, from the perspectives of patients and general practitioners (GPs). According to existing literature, MDM involving patients with a migration background may be complicated not only by general challenges arising in intercultural health communication, but also by specific cultural preferences concerning patient autonomy. Methods Data were collected through five focus group discussions (FGDs), organised in November and December 2023. Three FGDs involved patients from the major non-EU migrant population groups in Belgium (Moroccan (n = 6), Turkish (n = 6), and sub-Saharan African (n = 7)), and two FGDs involved GPs (n = 13). The data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Results Our results show that preferences and challenges revolved around four key components of MDM: Exchange of medical information, decision-making agency, patient-provider relationship, and treatment plan. Preferences and challenges were shaped by a complex interplay of factors at the individual (e.g., patient education, provider attitudes), interpersonal (e.g., family dynamics, language barriers), institutional (e.g., legal framework, medical education), and cultural levels (e.g., religion, health beliefs). Conclusion Our study highlights the importance of adopting an intersectional and multilayered perspective on MDM, which considers how various factors interact and shape preferences and challenges in MDM, depending on the individual and their context. Although it is impossible for GPs to be aware of every cultural preference, this study shows how GPs can engage in more culturally sensitive interactions with their patients. By also addressing the institutional factors that contribute to challenges in MDM, this approach can improve person-centred care by better accommodating each patient’s unique needs and preferences.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.105
Primary Topic
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

294 Preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making among patients with a migration background in Belgium: a focus group study

Edwin Wouters, Paul Van Royen, Nina Van Eekert, Katrien Bombeke et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
article

294 Preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making among patients with a migration background in Belgium: a focus group study

Edwin Wouters, Paul Van Royen, Nina Van Eekert, Katrien Bombeke, Josefien van Olmen, Veerle Buffel, Amina Yakhlaf, Sarah M. Van de Velde, Flore Vermijs
article en

Abstract

Abstract OP 12: Health Services 4, B210 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 17:00 - 18:00 Aim This study aims to broadly explore the preferences and challenges regarding medical decision-making (MDM) among patients with a migration background in Belgium, from the perspectives of patients and general practitioners (GPs). According to existing literature, MDM involving patients with a migration background may be complicated not only by general challenges arising in intercultural health communication, but also by specific cultural preferences concerning patient autonomy. Methods Data were collected through five focus group discussions (FGDs), organised in November and December 2023. Three FGDs involved patients from the major non-EU migrant population groups in Belgium (Moroccan (n = 6), Turkish (n = 6), and sub-Saharan African (n = 7)), and two FGDs involved GPs (n = 13). The data were analysed through reflexive thematic analysis. Results Our results show that preferences and challenges revolved around four key components of MDM: Exchange of medical information, decision-making agency, patient-provider relationship, and treatment plan. Preferences and challenges were shaped by a complex interplay of factors at the individual (e.g., patient education, provider attitudes), interpersonal (e.g., family dynamics, language barriers), institutional (e.g., legal framework, medical education), and cultural levels (e.g., religion, health beliefs). Conclusion Our study highlights the importance of adopting an intersectional and multilayered perspective on MDM, which considers how various factors interact and shape preferences and challenges in MDM, depending on the individual and their context. Although it is impossible for GPs to be aware of every cultural preference, this study shows how GPs can engage in more culturally sensitive interactions with their patients. By also addressing the institutional factors that contribute to challenges in MDM, this approach can improve person-centred care by better accommodating each patient’s unique needs and preferences.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_6)
Vrije Universiteit Brussel (BE), University of Antwerp (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.