374 Understanding questionnaire translation and cultural adaptation challenges in migrant populations: insights from validity evidence for the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)

Abstract OP 13: Research Methods, B304 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 17:00 - 18:00 Aims: The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a widely used tool for assessing health literacy across diverse populations, translated into 47 languages and used in over 80 countries. HLQ translation uses the Translation Integrity Protocol for linguistic and cultural adaptation to maximise construct equivalence. This study reviews HLQ validity evidence and explores key considerations for its use in migrant populations. Methods: A PRISMA systematic review (registered on PROSPERO) identified 257 studies on psychometric properties, with 22 articles across 15 countries/languages included in the analysis. Studies used factor analysis (n = 18), Rasch modelling (n = 3), and reported reliability indices, mainly Cronbach’s alpha (range: 0.57 to 0.95). Additional insights were drawn from translation and cognitive interview studies focusing on construct equivalence. Results: Most studies reported strong psychometric properties of the HLQ, though some required modifications (e.g., correlated residuals or item refinements) to achieve model fit. Professional interpreters often focused on linguistic adaptation and accuracy rather than ensuring construct equivalence in the new cultural and health system context. A main issue that requires careful consideration for migrant populations is the challenge of navigating foreign healthcare systems, not just language barriers. The findings recommend that effective linguistic and cultural adaptation strategies need to include (1) engaging clinicians who are familiar with local health systems, (2) prioritising commonly used language and terminology to ensure accessibility, and (3) involving migrants with lived experience of health issues. Conclusions: The HLQ demonstrates strong psychometric robustness across languages and cultures. We know it is being used in migrant populations in Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia. However, for migrant populations, translation alone may not be sufficient. Cognitive interviews need to extend beyond language comprehension to assess how migrants interpret health literacy constructs. Future adaptations should emphasise cultural and systemic navigation challenges to ensure meaningful health literacy assessment for intervention development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.109
Primary Topic
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

374 Understanding questionnaire translation and cultural adaptation challenges in migrant populations: insights from validity evidence for the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)

Christina Cheng, Maria J. Marques, Richard H. Osborne, Sónia Dias et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
article

374 Understanding questionnaire translation and cultural adaptation challenges in migrant populations: insights from validity evidence for the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)

Christina Cheng, Maria J. Marques, Richard H. Osborne, Sónia Dias, Sharla Cartner, Mélanie Hawkins
article en

Abstract

Abstract OP 13: Research Methods, B304 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 17:00 - 18:00 Aims: The Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a widely used tool for assessing health literacy across diverse populations, translated into 47 languages and used in over 80 countries. HLQ translation uses the Translation Integrity Protocol for linguistic and cultural adaptation to maximise construct equivalence. This study reviews HLQ validity evidence and explores key considerations for its use in migrant populations. Methods: A PRISMA systematic review (registered on PROSPERO) identified 257 studies on psychometric properties, with 22 articles across 15 countries/languages included in the analysis. Studies used factor analysis (n = 18), Rasch modelling (n = 3), and reported reliability indices, mainly Cronbach’s alpha (range: 0.57 to 0.95). Additional insights were drawn from translation and cognitive interview studies focusing on construct equivalence. Results: Most studies reported strong psychometric properties of the HLQ, though some required modifications (e.g., correlated residuals or item refinements) to achieve model fit. Professional interpreters often focused on linguistic adaptation and accuracy rather than ensuring construct equivalence in the new cultural and health system context. A main issue that requires careful consideration for migrant populations is the challenge of navigating foreign healthcare systems, not just language barriers. The findings recommend that effective linguistic and cultural adaptation strategies need to include (1) engaging clinicians who are familiar with local health systems, (2) prioritising commonly used language and terminology to ensure accessibility, and (3) involving migrants with lived experience of health issues. Conclusions: The HLQ demonstrates strong psychometric robustness across languages and cultures. We know it is being used in migrant populations in Europe, Africa, Asia and Australia. However, for migrant populations, translation alone may not be sufficient. Cognitive interviews need to extend beyond language comprehension to assess how migrants interpret health literacy constructs. Future adaptations should emphasise cultural and systemic navigation challenges to ensure meaningful health literacy assessment for intervention development.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_6)
National School of Public Health (GR), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.