80 Living in asylum – ambiguities of inclusion and exclusion. A critical ethical analysis

Abstract EP3.2, e-Poster Terminal 3, September 3, 2025, 13:05 - 14:00 Since 1993, social and health support for refugees in Germany has been regulated by the Asylum Seekers’ Benefits Act (AsylbLG), meaning that it is outside regular social and health care regulations that apply to the resident population, and it is limited in scope. Refugees are thus included and excluded at the same time in an ambivalent way both regarding medical care and social determinants of health. The aim of the poster is to trace an overall view of the social function and the ethically problematic effects of the restrictions in everyday life on health and well-being: What does it mean to live in asylum? Based on the conditions in Germany, it will be depicted which characteristics of living conditions in asylum can also be found globally. In order to identify ethically relevant patterns, material from empirical studies, in particular on the accommodation situation of refugees from various global contexts, was analysed based on the qualitative method of reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke 2022). This approach is an attempt to incorporate the results and methodological approaches of empirical sciences into philosophical-ethical reflection and thus establish a connection between the conditions of asylum that often remain rather abstract in the discourse and the actual fabric of social practices. It becomes visible how political decisions and legal norms, over which those affected have little influence, shape their lives and affect their health - from the micro-fabric of basic and intimate needs in everyday life to existential life decisions and questions of social and political participation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.394
Primary Topic
Migration, Health and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

80 Living in asylum – ambiguities of inclusion and exclusion. A critical ethical analysis

Sylvia Agbih
European Journal of Public Health
Migration, Health and Trauma
article

80 Living in asylum – ambiguities of inclusion and exclusion. A critical ethical analysis

Sylvia Agbih
article en

Abstract

Abstract EP3.2, e-Poster Terminal 3, September 3, 2025, 13:05 - 14:00 Since 1993, social and health support for refugees in Germany has been regulated by the Asylum Seekers’ Benefits Act (AsylbLG), meaning that it is outside regular social and health care regulations that apply to the resident population, and it is limited in scope. Refugees are thus included and excluded at the same time in an ambivalent way both regarding medical care and social determinants of health. The aim of the poster is to trace an overall view of the social function and the ethically problematic effects of the restrictions in everyday life on health and well-being: What does it mean to live in asylum? Based on the conditions in Germany, it will be depicted which characteristics of living conditions in asylum can also be found globally. In order to identify ethically relevant patterns, material from empirical studies, in particular on the accommodation situation of refugees from various global contexts, was analysed based on the qualitative method of reflexive thematic analysis (Braun & Clarke 2022). This approach is an attempt to incorporate the results and methodological approaches of empirical sciences into philosophical-ethical reflection and thus establish a connection between the conditions of asylum that often remain rather abstract in the discourse and the actual fabric of social practices. It becomes visible how political decisions and legal norms, over which those affected have little influence, shape their lives and affect their health - from the micro-fabric of basic and intimate needs in everyday life to existential life decisions and questions of social and political participation.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_6)
University of Augsburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Migration, Health and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.