21 Health service access for ethnic minority groups: a scoping review of complex interventions

Abstract OP 8: Health Services 6, B304 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 15:45 - 16:45 Background The aim of this scoping review is to systematically map the existing evidence of complex interventions used to improve access and/or engagement of ethnic minority groups with healthcare services in the UK, and the inclusivity of the evidence. Methods The review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. Six databases were searched. Analysis was completed using reflexive and thematic content analysis. Interventions were mapped against the five domains of the Patient-centred access framework and the PROGRESS-Plus equity framework. Results A total of 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies 63% were completed in primary care, 31% in mental health, 3% in maternity services and 3% in dental care. Several communities were represented, including Gypsy, Roma and Travellers, African Caribbeans, Jewish communities, and broader groups such as South Asians, migrants and Muslims. Complex interventions were spread across the five domains of the patient centred access framework and included strategies such as outreach workers, using community settings such as places of worship, cultural adaptations and cultural training for healthcare staff. Efficacy of interventions was assessed in a third of studies. PROGRESS-Plus analysis identified exclusion criteria including age groups (e.g. below 18 years), ethnic groups (e.g. not first-generation migrants), disabilities (e.g. severe mental health problems) and plus (e.g. language proficiency). Conclusions All domains of the patient centred access framework were represented with approachability and acceptability being the most common. Whilst the other domains were well represented, affordability and appropriateness had the least number of supporting sources. Efficacy assessment was not included in two thirds of studies however, complex interventions show promise to improve equity in underserved groups. Future research should endeavour to assess effectiveness and the translation of interventions in healthcare contexts outside of primary care and mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.087
Primary Topic
Cultural Competency in Health Care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

21 Health service access for ethnic minority groups: a scoping review of complex interventions

Joanna Fletcher, Gillian Woolhead, Jessica Pawson, Tolulope Olagoke Kolawole et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Cultural Competency in Health Care
article

21 Health service access for ethnic minority groups: a scoping review of complex interventions

Joanna Fletcher, Gillian Woolhead, Jessica Pawson, Tolulope Olagoke Kolawole, Katie Jane Sheehan, Jamie Ross, Alison Thomson, Saira Nazeer, S.R. Cannon, Caroline Phillpott
article en

Abstract

Abstract OP 8: Health Services 6, B304 (FCSH), September 3, 2025, 15:45 - 16:45 Background The aim of this scoping review is to systematically map the existing evidence of complex interventions used to improve access and/or engagement of ethnic minority groups with healthcare services in the UK, and the inclusivity of the evidence. Methods The review was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews Checklist. Six databases were searched. Analysis was completed using reflexive and thematic content analysis. Interventions were mapped against the five domains of the Patient-centred access framework and the PROGRESS-Plus equity framework. Results A total of 35 studies met the inclusion criteria. Of these studies 63% were completed in primary care, 31% in mental health, 3% in maternity services and 3% in dental care. Several communities were represented, including Gypsy, Roma and Travellers, African Caribbeans, Jewish communities, and broader groups such as South Asians, migrants and Muslims. Complex interventions were spread across the five domains of the patient centred access framework and included strategies such as outreach workers, using community settings such as places of worship, cultural adaptations and cultural training for healthcare staff. Efficacy of interventions was assessed in a third of studies. PROGRESS-Plus analysis identified exclusion criteria including age groups (e.g. below 18 years), ethnic groups (e.g. not first-generation migrants), disabilities (e.g. severe mental health problems) and plus (e.g. language proficiency). Conclusions All domains of the patient centred access framework were represented with approachability and acceptability being the most common. Whilst the other domains were well represented, affordability and appropriateness had the least number of supporting sources. Efficacy assessment was not included in two thirds of studies however, complex interventions show promise to improve equity in underserved groups. Future research should endeavour to assess effectiveness and the translation of interventions in healthcare contexts outside of primary care and mental health.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_6)
Queen Mary University of London (GB), Barts Health NHS Trust (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cultural Competency in Health Care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.