522 Assessing the acceptability of HPV self-sampling test among hard-to-reach women: A pre-post intervention study in Portugal

Abstract EP1.3, e-Poster Terminal 1, September 4, 2025, 10:05 - 10:25 Aims To explore the anticipated and experienced acceptability of HPV self-sampling test among hard-to-reach women in Portugal. Methods A pre-post intervention study was conducted in Portugal under the Horizon 2020 ELEVATE project with women of low socioeconomic status and migrants, recruited through community-based organizations in Lisbon. A total of 111 women attended an educational session on cervical cancer and screening and used a HPV self-sampling kit on site. Pre- and post-self-sampling questionnaires were applied. Analyses were conducted in R and included descriptive statistics and non-parametric Wilcoxon tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Before self-sampling, most participants expected the self-sampling test to be easy (90.9%), quick (76.5%), and trustworthy (92.8%), and confident performing it correctly (93.7%). Nearly half disagreed with potential concerns such as pain (44.1%), nervousness (57.6%), or needing assistance (41.4%). After self-sampling, these positive views were largely maintained. Compared to before self-sampling, 13% more participants disagreed that the test was painful (p < 0.001), and 11% more disagreed that it made them feel nervous (p = 0.023). The proportion who felt they needed assistance significantly decreased by 10.6% (p < 0.001), and the agreement that the test was fast significantly increased by 19% (p < 0.001). Trust in results (p = 0.52), embarrassment (p = 0.34), and confidence in performing the test correctly (p = 0.165) remained stable. Perceptions of ease (p = 0.94) and comfort (p = 0.106) improved slightly but were not statistically significant. Conclusion HPV self-sampling was found acceptable to most participants, highlighting its potential to reduce barriers and inequalities in cervical cancer screening. Future research should assess long-term adherence, screening uptake, user experiences in larger, more diverse populations and effective implementation strategies in routine care. The findings highlight the high potential of the HPV self-sampling test to be accepted and used, particularly by hard-to-reach women, contributing to equitable access to screening practices.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Public Health
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckaf180.321
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

522 Assessing the acceptability of HPV self-sampling test among hard-to-reach women: A pre-post intervention study in Portugal

Walaa Kinaan, Sónia Dias, Bruno Heleno, Patrícia Marques et al.
European Journal of Public Health
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

522 Assessing the acceptability of HPV self-sampling test among hard-to-reach women: A pre-post intervention study in Portugal

Walaa Kinaan, Sónia Dias, Bruno Heleno, Patrícia Marques, Ana Filipa Gama
article en

Abstract

Abstract EP1.3, e-Poster Terminal 1, September 4, 2025, 10:05 - 10:25 Aims To explore the anticipated and experienced acceptability of HPV self-sampling test among hard-to-reach women in Portugal. Methods A pre-post intervention study was conducted in Portugal under the Horizon 2020 ELEVATE project with women of low socioeconomic status and migrants, recruited through community-based organizations in Lisbon. A total of 111 women attended an educational session on cervical cancer and screening and used a HPV self-sampling kit on site. Pre- and post-self-sampling questionnaires were applied. Analyses were conducted in R and included descriptive statistics and non-parametric Wilcoxon tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Before self-sampling, most participants expected the self-sampling test to be easy (90.9%), quick (76.5%), and trustworthy (92.8%), and confident performing it correctly (93.7%). Nearly half disagreed with potential concerns such as pain (44.1%), nervousness (57.6%), or needing assistance (41.4%). After self-sampling, these positive views were largely maintained. Compared to before self-sampling, 13% more participants disagreed that the test was painful (p < 0.001), and 11% more disagreed that it made them feel nervous (p = 0.023). The proportion who felt they needed assistance significantly decreased by 10.6% (p < 0.001), and the agreement that the test was fast significantly increased by 19% (p < 0.001). Trust in results (p = 0.52), embarrassment (p = 0.34), and confidence in performing the test correctly (p = 0.165) remained stable. Perceptions of ease (p = 0.94) and comfort (p = 0.106) improved slightly but were not statistically significant. Conclusion HPV self-sampling was found acceptable to most participants, highlighting its potential to reduce barriers and inequalities in cervical cancer screening. Future research should assess long-term adherence, screening uptake, user experiences in larger, more diverse populations and effective implementation strategies in routine care. The findings highlight the high potential of the HPV self-sampling test to be accepted and used, particularly by hard-to-reach women, contributing to equitable access to screening practices.

European Journal of Public HealthVol. 35(Supplement_6)
National School of Public Health (GR), Universidade Nova de Lisboa (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.