From Collaboration to Critique: Engaging With GenAI to Foster Critical Thinking in Business Analytics

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in business education is reshaping data analysis and decision-making. However, concerns remain about potential over-reliance on GenAI at the expense of students’ critical thinking. This article presents an assessment designed to develop students’ technical proficiency in AI-supported data analysis while encouraging critical reflection on AI-generated outputs. Using a real-world-inspired case study, students collaborated with GenAI tools to conduct regression, forecasting, and hypothesis testing, and compared AI-generated results with manual analysis in Excel. Thematic analysis, aligned with Kolb’s experiential learning model, reveals stratified engagement: middle and strong performers demonstrated deeper reflection, especially on ethical implications and the importance of human oversight. Strong students further explored GenAI’s adaptability across different contexts. These findings contribute to the growing discourse on GenAI literacy in management education, underscoring the need for balanced pedagogical strategies that cultivate both AI skills and ethical and professional judgment essential for AI-augmented management practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Management Teaching Review
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/23792981251389862
Primary Topic
Statistics Education and Methodologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Collaboration to Critique: Engaging With GenAI to Foster Critical Thinking in Business Analytics

Lei Fang, Zhou Xue
Management Teaching Review
Statistics Education and Methodologies
article

From Collaboration to Critique: Engaging With GenAI to Foster Critical Thinking in Business Analytics

Lei Fang, Zhou Xue
article en

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in business education is reshaping data analysis and decision-making. However, concerns remain about potential over-reliance on GenAI at the expense of students’ critical thinking. This article presents an assessment designed to develop students’ technical proficiency in AI-supported data analysis while encouraging critical reflection on AI-generated outputs. Using a real-world-inspired case study, students collaborated with GenAI tools to conduct regression, forecasting, and hypothesis testing, and compared AI-generated results with manual analysis in Excel. Thematic analysis, aligned with Kolb’s experiential learning model, reveals stratified engagement: middle and strong performers demonstrated deeper reflection, especially on ethical implications and the importance of human oversight. Strong students further explored GenAI’s adaptability across different contexts. These findings contribute to the growing discourse on GenAI literacy in management education, underscoring the need for balanced pedagogical strategies that cultivate both AI skills and ethical and professional judgment essential for AI-augmented management practice.

Management Teaching Review
University of Leicester (GB), Queen Mary University of London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Statistics Education and Methodologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.