Ultrasonic‐assisted phytochemical extraction using hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvents: from solvation energy prediction to process optimization

Abstract BACKGROUND Green solvents provide sustainable alternatives to conventional organic solvents, reducing environmental and health hazards. This study investigates ultrasound‐assisted extraction of phytochemicals from Aegle marmelos leaves using the hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvent AD12 (acetic acid:n‐decanoic acid, 1:2). Parameter optimization, solvent recovery, and reusability are explored in this study. RESULTS Process intensification using response surface methodology identified optimal ultrasonic‐assisted extraction conditions: 400 rpm, 8 min pulsed ultrasonication (13 W), and 10 mL/g solvent‐to‐feed. Under these optimized conditions, the total extractive yield reached 42.90 ± 4.4 mg/g, while the total alkaloid and phenolic contents were 0.75 ± 0.14 and 1.27 ± 0.15 mg/g, respectively. Alkaloids were best recovered under mild conditions (13 W, 5 min, 14 mL/g), whereas phenolics required higher power (130 W, 5 min, 10 mL/g) for best recovery. Solvent recovery was optimized using a three‐stage pulsed ultrasonic protocol (10 min per stage, 130 W) with a 20 mL/mL deionized water‐to‐filtrate ratio, recovering 83.5 ± 0.02% decanoic acid and 31.25 ± 2.45 mg/g total extractive yield. AD12 retained >95% efficiency over five reuse cycles, confirming stability and recyclability. Further, extraction efficiency of three phytochemicals—aegeline, rutin, and marmelosin—showed a clear dependence on solute–solvent interactions in AD12 and ethanol. Alchemical free‐energy perturbation calculations of solvation free energies closely matched HPLC‐measured extractability, confirming AD12's superior capacity for aegeline and rutin, while ethanol favored marmelosin. This highlights the predictive value of solvent‐based computational modeling for targeted phytochemical extraction. CONCLUSION Hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvent AD12 enables selective, efficient, and reusable phytochemical extraction. Solvent‐based prediction coupled with ultrasonic‐assisted process intensification provides a rational approach for optimized recovery and scalable bioprocess design. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.70110
Primary Topic
Ionic liquids properties and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ultrasonic‐assisted phytochemical extraction using hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvents: from solvation energy prediction to process optimization

Atanu K. Metya, Jose V. Parambil, Shreyans K. Jain, Rashi Srivastava
Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
Ionic liquids properties and applications
article

Ultrasonic‐assisted phytochemical extraction using hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvents: from solvation energy prediction to process optimization

Atanu K. Metya, Jose V. Parambil, Shreyans K. Jain, Rashi Srivastava
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Green solvents provide sustainable alternatives to conventional organic solvents, reducing environmental and health hazards. This study investigates ultrasound‐assisted extraction of phytochemicals from Aegle marmelos leaves using the hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvent AD12 (acetic acid:n‐decanoic acid, 1:2). Parameter optimization, solvent recovery, and reusability are explored in this study. RESULTS Process intensification using response surface methodology identified optimal ultrasonic‐assisted extraction conditions: 400 rpm, 8 min pulsed ultrasonication (13 W), and 10 mL/g solvent‐to‐feed. Under these optimized conditions, the total extractive yield reached 42.90 ± 4.4 mg/g, while the total alkaloid and phenolic contents were 0.75 ± 0.14 and 1.27 ± 0.15 mg/g, respectively. Alkaloids were best recovered under mild conditions (13 W, 5 min, 14 mL/g), whereas phenolics required higher power (130 W, 5 min, 10 mL/g) for best recovery. Solvent recovery was optimized using a three‐stage pulsed ultrasonic protocol (10 min per stage, 130 W) with a 20 mL/mL deionized water‐to‐filtrate ratio, recovering 83.5 ± 0.02% decanoic acid and 31.25 ± 2.45 mg/g total extractive yield. AD12 retained >95% efficiency over five reuse cycles, confirming stability and recyclability. Further, extraction efficiency of three phytochemicals—aegeline, rutin, and marmelosin—showed a clear dependence on solute–solvent interactions in AD12 and ethanol. Alchemical free‐energy perturbation calculations of solvation free energies closely matched HPLC‐measured extractability, confirming AD12's superior capacity for aegeline and rutin, while ethanol favored marmelosin. This highlights the predictive value of solvent‐based computational modeling for targeted phytochemical extraction. CONCLUSION Hydrophobic natural deep eutectic solvent AD12 enables selective, efficient, and reusable phytochemical extraction. Solvent‐based prediction coupled with ultrasonic‐assisted process intensification provides a rational approach for optimized recovery and scalable bioprocess design. © 2025 Society of Chemical Industry (SCI).

Journal of Chemical Technology & BiotechnologyVol. 101(3)
Indian Institute of Technology Patna (IN), Banaras Hindu University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Ionic liquids properties and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.