Reimagining Nursing Education and Reinvesting the Dividends to Build Healthier and More Equitable Communities

One of the most pivotal developments in health and healthcare over the past 50 years was the 1974 publication of the Lalonde (1974) Report, “A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians.” This groundbreaking report initiated a paradigm shift by recognizing that health and well-being are influenced not only by clinical care but also by the environments in which individuals live, work, play, and learn. Lalonde's report redefined the concept of health and sparked a worldwide movement to address social determinants, integrating them into research, policy, and practice. This evolution continues to impact health systems today, underscoring the necessity of interventions beyond clinical settings, including within homes, schools, workplaces, and communities. Lalonde's report echoed the early vision of nursing pioneers such as Lillian Wald and Mary Breckenridge. Wald established the Henry Street Settlement in New York City, setting a precedent for public health nursing, while Breckenridge founded the Frontier Nursing Service in Kentucky, bringing accessible care to rural America. Their visionary work laid the foundation for integrating social determinants and community engagement into nursing practice. However, as hospitals proliferated in the early twentieth century, nursing education and practice shifted toward clinical care within hospital walls, which sidelined the community-based roots of the profession (Atkins 2024). The 1974 publication of the Lalonde Report, “A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians,” was a watershed moment that catalyzed a paradigm shift in health and healthcare, broadening the focus beyond clinical care to encompass the social determinants that shape well-being. In a similar vein, Patricia Benner's Educating Nurses: A Call for Radical Transformation (2010) initiated a paradigm shift within nursing itself and profoundly transformed nurse education. By challenging traditional, time-based educational models and championing competency-based education (CBE), Benner's work reoriented the profession toward mastery of essential skills and knowledge, equipping nurses to meet the demands of increasingly complex health and healthcare environments. To be certain, there are significant health and healthcare challenges that persist today, such as limited access to care, rising healthcare costs, workforce shortages, and disparities in health outcomes among different populations. These challenges are further complicated by shifting demographics, technological advancements, and the growing burden of chronic diseases. However, there is good reason to believe that our capacity to address these issues increases as we focus more intentionally on the upstream determinants of health and better leverage the unique skills that nurses bring as providers, problem-solvers, and leaders. In the following pages, I explore how reimagining nursing education can be shaped by the transformative ideas found in the Lalonde Report and Benner's call to action. These perspectives guided the recommended changes needed to address both current and future challenges. Specifically, nursing education must fully integrate competency-based education—including robust clinical rotations—leverage its dividends to expand and diversify the workforce, and create an educational architecture that centers communities and the social determinants of health. The next section of this paper explores how integrating competency-based education with robust clinical rotations is a critical step in this larger redesign. By aligning educational structures with the realities and complexities of patient care we can ensure that our graduates are prepared, adaptive, and ready to lead in an ever-changing healthcare landscape. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education, published in 2021, represents a foundational shift in the way nursing is taught and learned in the United States (AACN 2021). These Essentials were developed in direct response to persistent calls for reform—most notably those articulated by Benner and colleagues in their seminal work, which argued that nursing education required a radical transformation to overcome the limitations of traditional, time-based curricula and to better prepare nurses for the realities of clinical practice. Unlike older models that primarily measured progress by credit hours and time spent in classrooms or clinical placements, the AACN Essentials framework outlines explicitly defined domains and subdomains of practice, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of each competency before advancing (AACN 2021). This competency-based approach is a marked disruption from convention, shifting the focus from exposure to content toward proven ability in practical, real-world scenarios. This transition toward competency-based education (CBE) is especially promising as it directly tackles one of nursing education's most enduring critiques—the academic-practice gap—a problem rigorously documented by Benner et al. (2010). CBE is designed to ensure that all competencies are measurable, observable, and aligned with the complex skills nurses need in practice, as noted by (Atkins and Szanton 2025; Atkins, Brown, Mudd, et al. 2025; Atkins, Brown, and Szanton 2025). By emphasising outcome-driven learning, CBE ensures that graduates emerge not only as knowledgeable and clinically competent professionals but also as practitioners capable of translating learning into effective patient care. Yet, while the shift to CBE represents a meaningful advance, it is important to recognise that the transformation cannot be considered comprehensive until clinical rotations are fully integrated into the competency framework. As we argued in our recent manuscript (Atkins, Brown, and Szanton 2025), the true value of CBE is realised only when students have regular, structured opportunities to apply their competencies in authentic clinical settings. Clinical rotations are essential for bridging the gap between classroom theory and real-world practice—they provide the context in which students can demonstrate, refine, and internalise the competencies outlined in the AACN Essentials. Without these hands-on experiences, CBE risks becoming another academic exercise, rather than a robust preparation for the complexities of nursing practice. Competency-Based Education offers a transformative approach to nursing clinical rotations by shifting the focus from time-based experiences to the demonstration of clearly defined, practice-ready competencies. The persistent reliance on traditional models—where students accumulate clinical hours without assurances of consistent or meaningful exposure—perpetuates variability in readiness for practice (Atkins, Brown, and Szanton, under review). CBE directly addresses this by providing students with explicit competencies that are observable, measurable, and closely aligned with professional nursing roles. For example, at the start of a clinical rotation, students might receive a digital dashboard outlining essential competencies such as safe medication administration, patient communication, and clinical documentation. These benchmarks guide both learning and assessment, ensuring that students and preceptors share a transparent understanding of expectations throughout the rotation. In sum, a crucial step in advancing nursing education is to ensure that competency-based curricula include well-designed clinical rotations, allowing students to practice and be assessed in the environments where their skills will matter most. This approach not only strengthens the alignment between education and practice but also ensures that new nurses are truly prepared to meet the demands of today's dynamic healthcare landscape. As highlighted in Atkins, Brown, and Szanton (2025) clinical rotations represent an incredibly heavy operational and programmatic weight for nursing programs, requiring substantial faculty resources and coordination while also demanding a significant investment of students' time. On average, nursing students in the United States spend between 600 and 1000 h in clinical settings over the course of their education, depending on program requirements and state regulations (Spector et al. 2025). It is essential to recognize that clinical rotations, while invaluable for hands-on learning, also carry an inherent opportunity cost. Every hour students dedicate to clinical placements is time not available for engaging in other forms of learning such as mastering didactic course work and simulation-based education (SBE). The comprehensive transition to competency-based education (CBE) is more than an academic reform—it's a change in investment strategy in the future of nursing. By shifting the investment from accumulating clinical hours to targeted competency development, CBE enables students to acquire essential skills and knowledge more efficiently. This purposeful approach replaces chance encounters with meaningful clinical experiences, guiding students to master the competencies required for practice readiness. Importantly, by investing in CBE to improve efficiency in both classrooms and clinical settings, nursing programs will realize significant returns—what might be called the “dividends of CBE.” These dividends will include streamlined learning pathways, reduced reliance on rigid time-based models, and the capacity to admit and graduate more students without compromising educational quality. Not only will this benefit students, but it also has profound implications for creating an architecture of nursing education that relieves the persistent bottleneck afflicting nursing programs. Programs have long struggled to admit all qualified applicants due to shortages of clinical placements and faculty, leading to missed opportunities for aspiring nurses (AACN 2022). With CBE, clinical rotations become more strategic and resource-efficient, allowing programs to expand access and admit a greater number of applicants. Our work at the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing illustrates how reinvesting CBE dividends can optimise clinical education and drive diversity. Through the Outside Track initiative, we are exploring how clinical rotations with RN preceptors outside traditional acute care settings can support students' practice readiness (Johns Hopkins School of Nursing 2024). These experiences expose students to a broader spectrum of healthcare contexts and patient populations, enhancing their adaptability and understanding of real-world nursing practice. Concurrently, the Johns Hopkins Clinical Experience pilot investigates the impact of employing unit-based registered nurses as preceptors—both in individualised and small-group models—on student preparedness for entry into the nursing workforce. These innovative pilot programs not only expand the capacity for clinical education but also foster more personalised learning, enabling preceptors to identify and address competency gaps and mentor students from diverse backgrounds. Rather than using these gains simply to maintain the status quo, the dividends from CBE should be strategically reinvested to create a new architecture for nursing education—one that not only increases the number of nursing graduates but also intentionally prioritizes diversity within the workforce. Research demonstrates that a diverse nursing workforce more effectively addresses the health needs of all populations (Ku and Vichare 2023). This reinvestment might take the form of expanding targeted recruitment to enroll students from historically underrepresented backgrounds, providing tailored mentorship and support during and after clinical rotations, and designing curricula that reflect the needs and realities of individuals and families living in communities nurses will serve. With CBE, the roles of faculty shift from managing clinical groups to mentoring individual students, fostering deeper learning through personalized feedback and relationship-building. At the same time, programs can leverage experienced RNs as preceptors, which not only enhances the educational experience but also expands the program's overall capacity. For instance, with approximately 4,000,000 RNs nationwide, nursing programs have a substantial pool of potential preceptors to recruit, train, and employ. By reimagining clinical education in this way—and by integrating initiatives like the Outside Track and Johns Hopkins Clinical Experience pilots—programs can produce graduates who are truly practice-ready while simultaneously strengthening the pipeline for future nurses and addressing the national nursing shortage. Additionally, as programs admit greater numbers of students and reduce the time and resources required for traditional clinical education, they are presented with a transformative opportunity: to actively expand and diversify the pipeline into the nursing profession. Competency-based education, with its individualized approach, enables the identification and development of each learner's distinct strengths (Atkins, Brown, Mudd, et al. 2025). By prioritizing recruitment and tailored support for students from historically underrepresented backgrounds, programs contribute to a workforce that more accurately reflects the diversity of the communities it serves and is equipped to provide culturally competent care. Ultimately, the returns generated by CBE are not just about producing more nurses—they are about transforming nursing education to be more inclusive, adaptive, and responsive to the needs of patients and communities nurses serve. By intentionally reinvesting these dividends, and continuing to innovate through initiatives like Outside Track and the Johns Hopkins Clinical Experience pilot, we lay the groundwork for a future in which nursing graduates are not only practice-ready but also prepared to advance health equity, expand access to care, and meet the evolving needs of our society. As our understanding of what drives health and well-being evolves, it becomes imperative for nursing education to adapt accordingly. This shift echoes the insights of the Lalonde Report, which emphasised that health outcomes are profoundly influenced by social determinants such as environment, lifestyle, and biology, not just clinical care. Building on the dividends of competency-based education and the importance of workforce diversity, in the third and final section I argue that the next critical step is to design an educational architecture that centers communities and prepares nurses to excel across the full spectrum of care settings—acute care, primary care, health promotion, and health maintenance—and I provide some examples of the kinds of community-based care nurses are delivering. Although most Americans are born in hospitals and many spend their final hours there, as argued in the Lalonde report, the majority of factors shaping our health and well-being throughout life are rooted in our communities. From the environments we live in to the social connections we make, what happens outside hospital walls plays a far greater role in determining our overall health. This perspective highlights the need to reimagine the architecture of nursing education—so that nurses are fully prepared to provide clinical care but also recognize and address the community-based influences on health. As Pittman (2019) argued, “The new epidemiological reality is that most health outcomes are determined by social and environmental factors, not just clinical care.” This shift in understanding calls for nursing to return to its foundational role in community health. At the turn of the twentieth century, public health nursing pioneers like Lillian Wald sought to build healthier communities by establishing an “organic relationship with the neighborhood” and engaging with the realities of people's lives (Atkins 2024). Wald and her contemporaries built the foundations for nursing in the community by focusing on the social determinants of health: housing, nutrition, sanitation, and access to education. Their work demonstrated that nurses, deeply embedded within communities, were uniquely able to address both medical and social needs, supporting whole-person wellness. Revisiting these roots is essential in today's epidemiological landscape, as nurses are positioned to lead efforts that bridge clinical expertise with community engagement, ensuring care reaches people where they live and addressing the full spectrum of factors that shape health outcomes. There is a growing recognition that nurses are uniquely positioned to bridge clinical care and social supports, making them indispensable leaders in advancing health equity at the community level. According to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021) “The future of nursing lies not in expanding hospital roles, but in reimagining care delivery in homes, schools, and neighborhoods.” As outlined in the RN Role Reimagined, primary care shortages can be mitigated by empowering registered nurses to take on expanded roles. This approach includes RN-led visits, chronic care management, and the implementation of standardized procedures—strategies designed to enhance access to and continuity of care within community settings (California Health Care Foundation 2017). I have argued that the future of health and healthcare must center on communities and place greater emphasis on the social determinants that shape well-being. Nurses are uniquely positioned to deliver care that extends beyond hospital walls, addressing upstream factors such as environment, education, and social support. However, our current approach to nursing education not prepare nurses to work in this programs on acute care and traditional clinical settings, with limited opportunities for students to with community-based practice or the skills needed to address social determinants of health. as nurses can provide a broader of clinical care than is leading visits, managing chronic and care for complex (California Health Care Foundation 2017). With targeted and expanded clinical registered nurses can take on such as care, education, and care management, as as a role in models that improve access and To prepare nurses for the demands of healthcare, we must what and how we in both classroom and clinical environments. This integrating curricula that community engagement, and robust clinical experiences in diverse homes, schools, and As I have argued, CBE offers a promising to this future by shifting the focus from time-based to mastery of essential skills and Through CBE, we can ensure that nursing student demonstrates in such as care and while also providing individualised learning that reflect the realities of practice. By CBE, nursing education can produce graduates who are not only practice-ready but also equipped to lead transformative change in communities, deliver expanded clinical care, and advance health equity for the United States and innovative nursing models are reimagining how care is in homes, schools, and These share a to community-based care that extends beyond clinical to address social determinants of and nurses for these roles a readiness for imperative in nursing education. One in the United States is the work of Szanton and colleagues at the Johns Hopkins School of Their Nursing to provide and health and social care directly to and community such as and of nurses and community health deliver comprehensive care to people of all focusing on health equity, and community from pilot programs in demonstrate reduced health and community primary health care is a of nursing and the nursing The of this is the that provide comprehensive care to defined and 2021). These visits, and integrate public health with primary care, access and community of engaging nurses in care is the in the which has for its innovative of nurse nurses deliver the full of medical and to in their homes, patient continuity of care, and professional is for all of care for patients within a closely with primary care providers, and community approach has in patient and costs, and better health outcomes to traditional models et al. has to in such as the United and the United these models demonstrate that the future of nursing practice lies in the ability to deliver care that is deeply embedded in the the need for educational that prepare nurses for community engagement, and adaptability to diverse readiness for the evolving demands of practice. In this paper I have argued for a of the architecture of nursing a comprehensive of competency-based education. In while I have on CBE in this and Education are important of the architecture of nursing education and Szanton 2025; Atkins, Brown, Mudd, et al. 2025). It is important to that the of CBE, and within both classroom and clinical settings will be requiring I believe that these will significant dividends for the nursing profession and the communities we serve. I have to provide a of how I believe these resources and efforts should be strategically and the nursing workforce and education on nurses to address social determinants of health and deliver acute and primary care in communities. Building on the foundational insights of the Lalonde Report, which the critical importance of factors beyond traditional as environment, lifestyle, and social shaping health and Benner's call for a radical transformation in nursing education to better prepare nurses for these roles, there is a growing recognition that nurses are uniquely positioned to bridge clinical care and social supports, making them indispensable leaders in advancing health equity at the community level. This the foundation for a healthcare that is more and responsive to the needs of all communities. These optimise strengths to address the social determinants of reduce and at the community level. By nursing education, we are strategically the profession to leverage its only as the share of the healthcare workforce, but also as the most professionals with a of in communities. Nurses have a pivotal role in addressing the social determinants of health and both acute and primary clinical care directly where people live, and This approach ensures that the potential to drive health outcomes and advance equity at the community level. A practice-ready nursing workforce is uniquely positioned to advance health equity, expand access to care, and foster between healthcare and the populations they serve. Ultimately, the transformation of nursing education is from the broader of community health and social well-being. The has to and from other have with and are The has to The of not to this as were generated or during the current

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70418
Primary Topic
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining Nursing Education and Reinvesting the Dividends to Build Healthier and More Equitable Communities

Robert Atkins
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
article

Reimagining Nursing Education and Reinvesting the Dividends to Build Healthier and More Equitable Communities

Robert Atkins
article en

Abstract

One of the most pivotal developments in health and healthcare over the past 50 years was the 1974 publication of the Lalonde (1974) Report, “A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians.” This groundbreaking report initiated a paradigm shift by recognizing that health and well-being are influenced not only by clinical care but also by the environments in which individuals live, work, play, and learn. Lalonde's report redefined the concept of health and sparked a worldwide movement to address social determinants, integrating them into research, policy, and practice. This evolution continues to impact health systems today, underscoring the necessity of interventions beyond clinical settings, including within homes, schools, workplaces, and communities. Lalonde's report echoed the early vision of nursing pioneers such as Lillian Wald and Mary Breckenridge. Wald established the Henry Street Settlement in New York City, setting a precedent for public health nursing, while Breckenridge founded the Frontier Nursing Service in Kentucky, bringing accessible care to rural America. Their visionary work laid the foundation for integrating social determinants and community engagement into nursing practice. However, as hospitals proliferated in the early twentieth century, nursing education and practice shifted toward clinical care within hospital walls, which sidelined the community-based roots of the profession (Atkins 2024). The 1974 publication of the Lalonde Report, “A New Perspective on the Health of Canadians,” was a watershed moment that catalyzed a paradigm shift in health and healthcare, broadening the focus beyond clinical care to encompass the social determinants that shape well-being. In a similar vein, Patricia Benner's Educating Nurses: A Call for Radical Transformation (2010) initiated a paradigm shift within nursing itself and profoundly transformed nurse education. By challenging traditional, time-based educational models and championing competency-based education (CBE), Benner's work reoriented the profession toward mastery of essential skills and knowledge, equipping nurses to meet the demands of increasingly complex health and healthcare environments. To be certain, there are significant health and healthcare challenges that persist today, such as limited access to care, rising healthcare costs, workforce shortages, and disparities in health outcomes among different populations. These challenges are further complicated by shifting demographics, technological advancements, and the growing burden of chronic diseases. However, there is good reason to believe that our capacity to address these issues increases as we focus more intentionally on the upstream determinants of health and better leverage the unique skills that nurses bring as providers, problem-solvers, and leaders. In the following pages, I explore how reimagining nursing education can be shaped by the transformative ideas found in the Lalonde Report and Benner's call to action. These perspectives guided the recommended changes needed to address both current and future challenges. Specifically, nursing education must fully integrate competency-based education—including robust clinical rotations—leverage its dividends to expand and diversify the workforce, and create an educational architecture that centers communities and the social determinants of health. The next section of this paper explores how integrating competency-based education with robust clinical rotations is a critical step in this larger redesign. By aligning educational structures with the realities and complexities of patient care we can ensure that our graduates are prepared, adaptive, and ready to lead in an ever-changing healthcare landscape. The American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Essentials: Core Competencies for Professional Nursing Education, published in 2021, represents a foundational shift in the way nursing is taught and learned in the United States (AACN 2021). These Essentials were developed in direct response to persistent calls for reform—most notably those articulated by Benner and colleagues in their seminal work, which argued that nursing education required a radical transformation to overcome the limitations of traditional, time-based curricula and to better prepare nurses for the realities of clinical practice. Unlike older models that primarily measured progress by credit hours and time spent in classrooms or clinical placements, the AACN Essentials framework outlines explicitly defined domains and subdomains of practice, requiring students to demonstrate mastery of each competency before advancing (AACN 2021). This competency-based approach is a marked disruption from convention, shifting the focus from exposure to content toward proven ability in practical, real-world scenarios. This transition toward competency-based education (CBE) is especially promising as it directly tackles one of nursing education's most enduring critiques—the academic-practice gap—a problem rigorously documented by Benner et al. (2010). CBE is designed to ensure that all competencies are measurable, observable, and aligned with the complex skills nurses need in practice, as noted by (Atkins and Szanton 2025; Atkins, Brown, Mudd, et al. 2025; Atkins, Brown, and Szanton 2025). By emphasising outcome-driven learning, CBE ensures that graduates emerge not only as knowledgeable and clinically competent professionals but also as practitioners capable of translating learning into effective patient care. Yet, while the shift to CBE represents a meaningful advance, it is important to recognise that the transformation cannot be considered comprehensive until clinical rotations are fully integrated into the competency framework. As we argued in our recent manuscript (Atkins, Brown, and Szanton 2025), the true value of CBE is realised only when students have regular, structured opportunities to apply their competencies in authentic clinical settings. Clinical rotations are essential for bridging the gap between classroom theory and real-world practice—they provide the context in which students can demonstrate, refine, and internalise the competencies outlined in the AACN Essentials. Without these hands-on experiences, CBE risks becoming another academic exercise, rather than a robust preparation for the complexities of nursing practice. Competency-Based Education offers a transformative approach to nursing clinical rotations by shifting the focus from time-based experiences to the demonstration of clearly defined, practice-ready competencies. The persistent reliance on traditional models—where students accumulate clinical hours without assurances of consistent or meaningful exposure—perpetuates variability in readiness for practice (Atkins, Brown, and Szanton, under review). CBE directly addresses this by providing students with explicit competencies that are observable, measurable, and closely aligned with professional nursing roles. For example, at the start of a clinical rotation, students might receive a digital dashboard outlining essential competencies such as safe medication administration, patient communication, and clinical documentation. These benchmarks guide both learning and assessment, ensuring that students and preceptors share a transparent understanding of expectations throughout the rotation. In sum, a crucial step in advancing nursing education is to ensure that competency-based curricula include well-designed clinical rotations, allowing students to practice and be assessed in the environments where their skills will matter most. This approach not only strengthens the alignment between education and practice but also ensures that new nurses are truly prepared to meet the demands of today's dynamic healthcare landscape. As highlighted in Atkins, Brown, and Szanton (2025) clinical rotations represent an incredibly heavy operational and programmatic weight for nursing programs, requiring substantial faculty resources and coordination while also demanding a significant investment of students' time. On average, nursing students in the United States spend between 600 and 1000 h in clinical settings over the course of their education, depending on program requirements and state regulations (Spector et al. 2025). It is essential to recognize that clinical rotations, while invaluable for hands-on learning, also carry an inherent opportunity cost. Every hour students dedicate to clinical placements is time not available for engaging in other forms of learning such as mastering didactic course work and simulation-based education (SBE). The comprehensive transition to competency-based education (CBE) is more than an academic reform—it's a change in investment strategy in the future of nursing. By shifting the investment from accumulating clinical hours to targeted competency development, CBE enables students to acquire essential skills and knowledge more efficiently. This purposeful approach replaces chance encounters with meaningful clinical experiences, guiding students to master the competencies required for practice readiness. Importantly, by investing in CBE to improve efficiency in both classrooms and clinical settings, nursing programs will realize significant returns—what might be called the “dividends of CBE.” These dividends will include streamlined learning pathways, reduced reliance on rigid time-based models, and the capacity to admit and graduate more students without compromising educational quality. Not only will this benefit students, but it also has profound implications for creating an architecture of nursing education that relieves the persistent bottleneck afflicting nursing programs. Programs have long struggled to admit all qualified applicants due to shortages of clinical placements and faculty, leading to missed opportunities for aspiring nurses (AACN 2022). With CBE, clinical rotations become more strategic and resource-efficient, allowing programs to expand access and admit a greater number of applicants. Our work at the Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing illustrates how reinvesting CBE dividends can optimise clinical education and drive diversity. Through the Outside Track initiative, we are exploring how clinical rotations with RN preceptors outside traditional acute care settings can support students' practice readiness (Johns Hopkins School of Nursing 2024). These experiences expose students to a broader spectrum of healthcare contexts and patient populations, enhancing their adaptability and understanding of real-world nursing practice. Concurrently, the Johns Hopkins Clinical Experience pilot investigates the impact of employing unit-based registered nurses as preceptors—both in individualised and small-group models—on student preparedness for entry into the nursing workforce. These innovative pilot programs not only expand the capacity for clinical education but also foster more personalised learning, enabling preceptors to identify and address competency gaps and mentor students from diverse backgrounds. Rather than using these gains simply to maintain the status quo, the dividends from CBE should be strategically reinvested to create a new architecture for nursing education—one that not only increases the number of nursing graduates but also intentionally prioritizes diversity within the workforce. Research demonstrates that a diverse nursing workforce more effectively addresses the health needs of all populations (Ku and Vichare 2023). This reinvestment might take the form of expanding targeted recruitment to enroll students from historically underrepresented backgrounds, providing tailored mentorship and support during and after clinical rotations, and designing curricula that reflect the needs and realities of individuals and families living in communities nurses will serve. With CBE, the roles of faculty shift from managing clinical groups to mentoring individual students, fostering deeper learning through personalized feedback and relationship-building. At the same time, programs can leverage experienced RNs as preceptors, which not only enhances the educational experience but also expands the program's overall capacity. For instance, with approximately 4,000,000 RNs nationwide, nursing programs have a substantial pool of potential preceptors to recruit, train, and employ. By reimagining clinical education in this way—and by integrating initiatives like the Outside Track and Johns Hopkins Clinical Experience pilots—programs can produce graduates who are truly practice-ready while simultaneously strengthening the pipeline for future nurses and addressing the national nursing shortage. Additionally, as programs admit greater numbers of students and reduce the time and resources required for traditional clinical education, they are presented with a transformative opportunity: to actively expand and diversify the pipeline into the nursing profession. Competency-based education, with its individualized approach, enables the identification and development of each learner's distinct strengths (Atkins, Brown, Mudd, et al. 2025). By prioritizing recruitment and tailored support for students from historically underrepresented backgrounds, programs contribute to a workforce that more accurately reflects the diversity of the communities it serves and is equipped to provide culturally competent care. Ultimately, the returns generated by CBE are not just about producing more nurses—they are about transforming nursing education to be more inclusive, adaptive, and responsive to the needs of patients and communities nurses serve. By intentionally reinvesting these dividends, and continuing to innovate through initiatives like Outside Track and the Johns Hopkins Clinical Experience pilot, we lay the groundwork for a future in which nursing graduates are not only practice-ready but also prepared to advance health equity, expand access to care, and meet the evolving needs of our society. As our understanding of what drives health and well-being evolves, it becomes imperative for nursing education to adapt accordingly. This shift echoes the insights of the Lalonde Report, which emphasised that health outcomes are profoundly influenced by social determinants such as environment, lifestyle, and biology, not just clinical care. Building on the dividends of competency-based education and the importance of workforce diversity, in the third and final section I argue that the next critical step is to design an educational architecture that centers communities and prepares nurses to excel across the full spectrum of care settings—acute care, primary care, health promotion, and health maintenance—and I provide some examples of the kinds of community-based care nurses are delivering. Although most Americans are born in hospitals and many spend their final hours there, as argued in the Lalonde report, the majority of factors shaping our health and well-being throughout life are rooted in our communities. From the environments we live in to the social connections we make, what happens outside hospital walls plays a far greater role in determining our overall health. This perspective highlights the need to reimagine the architecture of nursing education—so that nurses are fully prepared to provide clinical care but also recognize and address the community-based influences on health. As Pittman (2019) argued, “The new epidemiological reality is that most health outcomes are determined by social and environmental factors, not just clinical care.” This shift in understanding calls for nursing to return to its foundational role in community health. At the turn of the twentieth century, public health nursing pioneers like Lillian Wald sought to build healthier communities by establishing an “organic relationship with the neighborhood” and engaging with the realities of people's lives (Atkins 2024). Wald and her contemporaries built the foundations for nursing in the community by focusing on the social determinants of health: housing, nutrition, sanitation, and access to education. Their work demonstrated that nurses, deeply embedded within communities, were uniquely able to address both medical and social needs, supporting whole-person wellness. Revisiting these roots is essential in today's epidemiological landscape, as nurses are positioned to lead efforts that bridge clinical expertise with community engagement, ensuring care reaches people where they live and addressing the full spectrum of factors that shape health outcomes. There is a growing recognition that nurses are uniquely positioned to bridge clinical care and social supports, making them indispensable leaders in advancing health equity at the community level. According to the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2021) “The future of nursing lies not in expanding hospital roles, but in reimagining care delivery in homes, schools, and neighborhoods.” As outlined in the RN Role Reimagined, primary care shortages can be mitigated by empowering registered nurses to take on expanded roles. This approach includes RN-led visits, chronic care management, and the implementation of standardized procedures—strategies designed to enhance access to and continuity of care within community settings (California Health Care Foundation 2017). I have argued that the future of health and healthcare must center on communities and place greater emphasis on the social determinants that shape well-being. Nurses are uniquely positioned to deliver care that extends beyond hospital walls, addressing upstream factors such as environment, education, and social support. However, our current approach to nursing education not prepare nurses to work in this programs on acute care and traditional clinical settings, with limited opportunities for students to with community-based practice or the skills needed to address social determinants of health. as nurses can provide a broader of clinical care than is leading visits, managing chronic and care for complex (California Health Care Foundation 2017). With targeted and expanded clinical registered nurses can take on such as care, education, and care management, as as a role in models that improve access and To prepare nurses for the demands of healthcare, we must what and how we in both classroom and clinical environments. This integrating curricula that community engagement, and robust clinical experiences in diverse homes, schools, and As I have argued, CBE offers a promising to this future by shifting the focus from time-based to mastery of essential skills and Through CBE, we can ensure that nursing student demonstrates in such as care and while also providing individualised learning that reflect the realities of practice. By CBE, nursing education can produce graduates who are not only practice-ready but also equipped to lead transformative change in communities, deliver expanded clinical care, and advance health equity for the United States and innovative nursing models are reimagining how care is in homes, schools, and These share a to community-based care that extends beyond clinical to address social determinants of and nurses for these roles a readiness for imperative in nursing education. One in the United States is the work of Szanton and colleagues at the Johns Hopkins School of Their Nursing to provide and health and social care directly to and community such as and of nurses and community health deliver comprehensive care to people of all focusing on health equity, and community from pilot programs in demonstrate reduced health and community primary health care is a of nursing and the nursing The of this is the that provide comprehensive care to defined and 2021). These visits, and integrate public health with primary care, access and community of engaging nurses in care is the in the which has for its innovative of nurse nurses deliver the full of medical and to in their homes, patient continuity of care, and professional is for all of care for patients within a closely with primary care providers, and community approach has in patient and costs, and better health outcomes to traditional models et al. has to in such as the United and the United these models demonstrate that the future of nursing practice lies in the ability to deliver care that is deeply embedded in the the need for educational that prepare nurses for community engagement, and adaptability to diverse readiness for the evolving demands of practice. In this paper I have argued for a of the architecture of nursing a comprehensive of competency-based education. In while I have on CBE in this and Education are important of the architecture of nursing education and Szanton 2025; Atkins, Brown, Mudd, et al. 2025). It is important to that the of CBE, and within both classroom and clinical settings will be requiring I believe that these will significant dividends for the nursing profession and the communities we serve. I have to provide a of how I believe these resources and efforts should be strategically and the nursing workforce and education on nurses to address social determinants of health and deliver acute and primary care in communities. Building on the foundational insights of the Lalonde Report, which the critical importance of factors beyond traditional as environment, lifestyle, and social shaping health and Benner's call for a radical transformation in nursing education to better prepare nurses for these roles, there is a growing recognition that nurses are uniquely positioned to bridge clinical care and social supports, making them indispensable leaders in advancing health equity at the community level. This the foundation for a healthcare that is more and responsive to the needs of all communities. These optimise strengths to address the social determinants of reduce and at the community level. By nursing education, we are strategically the profession to leverage its only as the share of the healthcare workforce, but also as the most professionals with a of in communities. Nurses have a pivotal role in addressing the social determinants of health and both acute and primary clinical care directly where people live, and This approach ensures that the potential to drive health outcomes and advance equity at the community level. A practice-ready nursing workforce is uniquely positioned to advance health equity, expand access to care, and foster between healthcare and the populations they serve. Ultimately, the transformation of nursing education is from the broader of community health and social well-being. The has to and from other have with and are The has to The of not to this as were generated or during the current

Journal of Advanced Nursing
Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.