Bridging the Divide: Insights into Australian Parents’ Vaccine Decision Making

This paper reflects on the polarised landscape of vaccine decision making among Australian parents, examining how parents think and make decisions about vaccinating their children and how they rationalise their varied vaccine stances. My interviews with six Australian parents, conducted during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, found surprising similarities in decision making between parents of varied vaccine stances. This finding challenges the ideological division between ‘pro-vax’ and ‘anti-vax’ groups, as well as the construction of anti-vax or vaccine hesitant parents as the difficult, irredeemable ‘other’. In doing so, this article aims to provide a potential starting point for how we can move toward a productive discourse around vaccine decision making, following the polarising effects of the pandemic. Through highlighting mothers’ use of embodied knowledge, I also aim to expand the conception of what we consider important in making a vaccination decision beyond the purely rational and biomedical.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dispute resolution review.
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.146328
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging the Divide: Insights into Australian Parents’ Vaccine Decision Making

Elizabeth Fewster
Dispute resolution review.
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

Bridging the Divide: Insights into Australian Parents’ Vaccine Decision Making

Elizabeth Fewster
article en

Abstract

This paper reflects on the polarised landscape of vaccine decision making among Australian parents, examining how parents think and make decisions about vaccinating their children and how they rationalise their varied vaccine stances. My interviews with six Australian parents, conducted during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, found surprising similarities in decision making between parents of varied vaccine stances. This finding challenges the ideological division between ‘pro-vax’ and ‘anti-vax’ groups, as well as the construction of anti-vax or vaccine hesitant parents as the difficult, irredeemable ‘other’. In doing so, this article aims to provide a potential starting point for how we can move toward a productive discourse around vaccine decision making, following the polarising effects of the pandemic. Through highlighting mothers’ use of embodied knowledge, I also aim to expand the conception of what we consider important in making a vaccination decision beyond the purely rational and biomedical.

Dispute resolution review.Vol. 4(3)
Australian National University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging the Divide: Insights into Australian Parents’ Vaccine Decision Making — Elizabeth Fewster · Dispute resolution review. (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS