Foreword: Bridging Polarised Discourse

Dispute is an unavoidable form of social engagement.This special issue contributes contemporary experiences and perspectives on conflict and on dispute resolution from an anthropological perspective.The authors acknowledge existing discourses among scholars and practitioners in disciplines including law, negotiation, mediation, psychology, and communication (not to the exclusion of others), and it is to these conversations that we contribute.Like our colleagues in other disciplines, anthropologists tend to champion effective management to prevent dispute from developing into long-term harm, damage, or resentful entanglements.However, as this special issue shows, sometimes even our own community of practice can find itself in seemingly unresolvable dispute situations.Active contestation of ideas may foster new insights and improve outcomes or ways of working together.The existing dispute management discourses offer frameworks to help individuals, groups, corporations, and countries move beyond positional arguments to more principled, empathetic and constructive resolution.We bring our insights into bridging polarised discourses, drawing from anthropological research methods such as participant observation (in the field) and ethnography (synthesising observed social behaviours and cultural framings through the lens of theory).That is not to say that anthropology is the 'magic wand' to arrive at peaceful conclusions; but we suggest that it provides methodological and analytical tools with which the roots of conflicting values may be understood-no matter how difficult.This understanding opens the way for meaningful, respectful engagement, increasing the potential for contesting parties to find common ground and potentially common ground, between contesting parties.The authors each contribute important methods and insights arising from their different settings.Their grounded research provides real contexts to theoretical discussion of principles of negotiation.The authors in this volume are not the first in our discipline to contribute to this dialogue.Eminent anthropologist William Ury helped to establish the International Negotiation Network

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dispute resolution review.
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53300/001c.151833
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Foreword: Bridging Polarised Discourse

Adele Millard
Dispute resolution review.
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
article

Foreword: Bridging Polarised Discourse

Adele Millard
article en

Abstract

Dispute is an unavoidable form of social engagement.This special issue contributes contemporary experiences and perspectives on conflict and on dispute resolution from an anthropological perspective.The authors acknowledge existing discourses among scholars and practitioners in disciplines including law, negotiation, mediation, psychology, and communication (not to the exclusion of others), and it is to these conversations that we contribute.Like our colleagues in other disciplines, anthropologists tend to champion effective management to prevent dispute from developing into long-term harm, damage, or resentful entanglements.However, as this special issue shows, sometimes even our own community of practice can find itself in seemingly unresolvable dispute situations.Active contestation of ideas may foster new insights and improve outcomes or ways of working together.The existing dispute management discourses offer frameworks to help individuals, groups, corporations, and countries move beyond positional arguments to more principled, empathetic and constructive resolution.We bring our insights into bridging polarised discourses, drawing from anthropological research methods such as participant observation (in the field) and ethnography (synthesising observed social behaviours and cultural framings through the lens of theory).That is not to say that anthropology is the 'magic wand' to arrive at peaceful conclusions; but we suggest that it provides methodological and analytical tools with which the roots of conflicting values may be understood-no matter how difficult.This understanding opens the way for meaningful, respectful engagement, increasing the potential for contesting parties to find common ground and potentially common ground, between contesting parties.The authors each contribute important methods and insights arising from their different settings.Their grounded research provides real contexts to theoretical discussion of principles of negotiation.The authors in this volume are not the first in our discipline to contribute to this dialogue.Eminent anthropologist William Ury helped to establish the International Negotiation Network

Dispute resolution review.Vol. 4(3)
The University of Western Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.