Co-learning in crisis: A comparative analysis of digital preparedness during COVID-19 in Taiwan and the United Kingdom

This article provides a comparative analysis of digital interventions implemented in Taiwan and the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic to examine how national contexts shaped the rollout and reception of these technologies. Our analysis challenges the simplistic East/West divide often invoked in pandemic response analyses, which arose during and in the wake of the pandemic, arguing that successes or failures of digital health interventions must exceed assumed cultural traits in East or West, and consider sociohistorical factors, legal frameworks, and specific political contexts. By advancing interdisciplinary co-learning between research communities in Taiwan and the UK, this article offers actionable insights for enhancing digital preparedness for future global public health emergencies, underscoring the importance of cultures of preparedness, transparency, and public trust and responsible data governance for digital health technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Global Public Health
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/17441692.2025.2593786
Primary Topic
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-learning in crisis: A comparative analysis of digital preparedness during COVID-19 in Taiwan and the United Kingdom

Po‐Han Lee, Gabrielle Samuel, Stephen Roberts, Chen‐I Kuan et al.
Global Public Health
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
article

Co-learning in crisis: A comparative analysis of digital preparedness during COVID-19 in Taiwan and the United Kingdom

Po‐Han Lee, Gabrielle Samuel, Stephen Roberts, Chen‐I Kuan, Po-Yao Huang
article en

Abstract

This article provides a comparative analysis of digital interventions implemented in Taiwan and the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic to examine how national contexts shaped the rollout and reception of these technologies. Our analysis challenges the simplistic East/West divide often invoked in pandemic response analyses, which arose during and in the wake of the pandemic, arguing that successes or failures of digital health interventions must exceed assumed cultural traits in East or West, and consider sociohistorical factors, legal frameworks, and specific political contexts. By advancing interdisciplinary co-learning between research communities in Taiwan and the UK, this article offers actionable insights for enhancing digital preparedness for future global public health emergencies, underscoring the importance of cultures of preparedness, transparency, and public trust and responsible data governance for digital health technologies.

Global Public HealthVol. 20(1)
King's College London (GB), National Institute of Health Sciences (LK), Global Policy Institute (US), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co-learning in crisis: A comparative analysis of digital preparedness during COVID-19 in Taiwan and the United Kingdom — Po‐Han Lee, Gabrielle Samuel, et al. · Global Public Health (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS