Generative AI in Cross-Border Trade: Classification Conundrum and Governance Divergence under WTO Rules

The proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) presents a systemic challenge to the multilateral trading system, centred on its unresolved legal classification. The determination of whether Generative AI constitutes ‘goods’ under General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) or ‘services’ under General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is a strategic choice that dictates the applicable legal regime and shapes the permissibility of divergent national regulations. This article dissects this dilemma, arguing that a generalized ‘goods’ classification is legally and strategically untenable. Proceeding from a services-based framework, the analysis examines the significant tensions between emerging national AI regulations and core World Trade Organization (WTO) disciplines, particularly under GATS and the TradeRelated Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. This legal analysis further illuminates the divergent regulatory philosophies of the regulations, and the corresponding strategic responses available to different national blocs. The article concludes by advocating for international cooperation to adapt the multilateral trading system, ensuring a predictable, rulesbased environment for the digital economy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of World Trade
Published
2025-12-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54648/trad2026004
Primary Topic
World Trade Organization Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generative AI in Cross-Border Trade: Classification Conundrum and Governance Divergence under WTO Rules

Zhe Chen
Journal of World Trade
World Trade Organization Law
article

Generative AI in Cross-Border Trade: Classification Conundrum and Governance Divergence under WTO Rules

Zhe Chen
article en

Abstract

The proliferation of Generative Artificial Intelligence (Generative AI) presents a systemic challenge to the multilateral trading system, centred on its unresolved legal classification. The determination of whether Generative AI constitutes ‘goods’ under General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) or ‘services’ under General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) is a strategic choice that dictates the applicable legal regime and shapes the permissibility of divergent national regulations. This article dissects this dilemma, arguing that a generalized ‘goods’ classification is legally and strategically untenable. Proceeding from a services-based framework, the analysis examines the significant tensions between emerging national AI regulations and core World Trade Organization (WTO) disciplines, particularly under GATS and the TradeRelated Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement. This legal analysis further illuminates the divergent regulatory philosophies of the regulations, and the corresponding strategic responses available to different national blocs. The article concludes by advocating for international cooperation to adapt the multilateral trading system, ensuring a predictable, rulesbased environment for the digital economy.

Journal of World TradeVol. 60(Issue 1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
World Trade Organization Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.