Rethinking (un)blinding in biomedical proposal peer review: A multi-stakeholder qualitative study
While there remains a strong preference for double-blinded review within the context of our study, its limitations have become evident-particularly given current funding challenges. These shortcomings highlight the need for greater openness in peer review and increased transparency in fund allocation processes.
Authors
- Kris Dierickx (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-1145)
- Seba Qussini (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3701-8066)
- Farizah Mezer Anami
Institutions
- Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
- KU Leuven (BE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Accountability in Research
- Published
- 2025-12-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2025.2593625
- Primary Topic
- scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00