Reimagining urban air-quality governance: A systems-thinking framework

Despite stringent ambient air quality standards, air pollution remains a persistent issue in many regions due to inadequate policy implementation at the local level. This reflects a form of policy resistance where misaligned stakeholder goals undermine otherwise well-intentioned governmental interventions, highlighting the need for realignment around common objectives to achieve meaningful progress. We apply a systems thinking approach to identify implementation gaps in air quality management, using India as a focal point. Adapting the Integrated Air Quality and Climate Change (IAQCC) framework, we construct causal loop diagrams (CLDs) to map the complex feedback relationships among policy enforcement, data infrastructure, stakeholder behavior, and health outcomes. Through a literature review and expert consultations, we identify three loops that perpetuate policy stagnation: (1) insufficient monitoring data hampers source identification, policy evaluation, and refinement, (2) fragmented jurisdictional authority hinders coordination among stakeholders, and (3) weak local compliance erodes public trust and engagement. All three loops stem from the absence of a unifying objective. We propose reorienting the system around a public health goal, such as reductions in premature mortality or asthma incidence, to align stakeholder incentives and reduce resistance to local policy implementation. We identify three key leverage points to enable this realignment: (1) establish integrated and accessible air-and-health data platforms, (2) coordinate across jurisdictional boundaries through airshed-based governance, and (3) empower citizen-science and community-led oversight. This approach shifts the focus from top-down technocratic management to participatory, democratic governance, showing how targeted, strategic interventions can produce improvements in air quality management.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.181059
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reimagining urban air-quality governance: A systems-thinking framework

Sagnik Dey, Om Damani, Teresa Kramarz, Meredith Franklin et al.
1 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
article

Reimagining urban air-quality governance: A systems-thinking framework

Sagnik Dey, Om Damani, Teresa Kramarz, Meredith Franklin, Harshit Gujral, Anshul Agarwal, Ronak Sutaria, Steve Easterbrook, Christoph Becker
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite stringent ambient air quality standards, air pollution remains a persistent issue in many regions due to inadequate policy implementation at the local level. This reflects a form of policy resistance where misaligned stakeholder goals undermine otherwise well-intentioned governmental interventions, highlighting the need for realignment around common objectives to achieve meaningful progress. We apply a systems thinking approach to identify implementation gaps in air quality management, using India as a focal point. Adapting the Integrated Air Quality and Climate Change (IAQCC) framework, we construct causal loop diagrams (CLDs) to map the complex feedback relationships among policy enforcement, data infrastructure, stakeholder behavior, and health outcomes. Through a literature review and expert consultations, we identify three loops that perpetuate policy stagnation: (1) insufficient monitoring data hampers source identification, policy evaluation, and refinement, (2) fragmented jurisdictional authority hinders coordination among stakeholders, and (3) weak local compliance erodes public trust and engagement. All three loops stem from the absence of a unifying objective. We propose reorienting the system around a public health goal, such as reductions in premature mortality or asthma incidence, to align stakeholder incentives and reduce resistance to local policy implementation. We identify three key leverage points to enable this realignment: (1) establish integrated and accessible air-and-health data platforms, (2) coordinate across jurisdictional boundaries through airshed-based governance, and (3) empower citizen-science and community-led oversight. This approach shifts the focus from top-down technocratic management to participatory, democratic governance, showing how targeted, strategic interventions can produce improvements in air quality management.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 1010
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN), University of Toronto (CA), Center for Independent Living (US), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
1.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.