Overcoming Ignorance-Making in Acknowledging and Responding to Harm in Custodial Settings: The Use of Open Disclosure

Although preventable harm in custodial settings has been widely documented, progress towards implementing the reforms that are often identified in reviews and inquiries into the quality of care afforded has been slow. It has even been suggested that government departments routinely engage in the practice of ignorance-making — the intentional use of strategies to deny the ongoing experience of harm, to deflect attention away from the statutory body, and/or to minimise responsibility. One means of countering such practice is open disclosure; a process that involves acknowledging and apologising for harm, and engaging directly with affected individuals and families. In this article we examine the occurrence of preventable harm in custodial settings, employing a case study from Australia’s Northern Territory to contrast criminal justice responses with the more transparent approaches that have been adopted in healthcare. We put forward recommendations to improve harm recognition, embed meaningful apology, and strengthen systemic accountability in custodial settings in Australia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.4188
Primary Topic
Elder Abuse and Neglect
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overcoming Ignorance-Making in Acknowledging and Responding to Harm in Custodial Settings: The Use of Open Disclosure

Luke Butcher, Andrew Day, David K. Palmer
International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
Elder Abuse and Neglect
article

Overcoming Ignorance-Making in Acknowledging and Responding to Harm in Custodial Settings: The Use of Open Disclosure

Luke Butcher, Andrew Day, David K. Palmer
article en

Abstract

Although preventable harm in custodial settings has been widely documented, progress towards implementing the reforms that are often identified in reviews and inquiries into the quality of care afforded has been slow. It has even been suggested that government departments routinely engage in the practice of ignorance-making — the intentional use of strategies to deny the ongoing experience of harm, to deflect attention away from the statutory body, and/or to minimise responsibility. One means of countering such practice is open disclosure; a process that involves acknowledging and apologising for harm, and engaging directly with affected individuals and families. In this article we examine the occurrence of preventable harm in custodial settings, employing a case study from Australia’s Northern Territory to contrast criminal justice responses with the more transparent approaches that have been adopted in healthcare. We put forward recommendations to improve harm recognition, embed meaningful apology, and strengthen systemic accountability in custodial settings in Australia.

International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy
The University of Melbourne (AU), Charles Darwin University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Elder Abuse and Neglect
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Overcoming Ignorance-Making in Acknowledging and Responding to Harm in Custodial Settings: The Use of Open Disclosure — Luke Butcher, Andrew Day, et al. · International Journal for Crime Justice and Social Democracy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS