A Meta‐analysis of Functional Outcomes and Recovery Metrics Comparing Transoral Robotic Surgery and (Chemo)Radiotherapy

This review presents the most extensive examination to date of swallowing performance and recovery metrics in controlled trials of transoral robotic surgery versus (chemo)radiotherapy. Our findings show that transoral robotic surgery shows promise in managing difficult anatomical areas and low-grade tumors. However, methodological inconsistencies were noted between included studies, particularly in eligibility criteria and human papillomavirus p16 status. Consensus statements and/or guidelines on stratification and reporting of patients may aid in reducing this heterogeneity, while further randomized controlled trials may improve our understanding and guide the development of clinical guidelines on treatment choice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Otolaryngology
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.70069
Primary Topic
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Meta‐analysis of Functional Outcomes and Recovery Metrics Comparing Transoral Robotic Surgery and (Chemo)Radiotherapy

Muzammil Arif Din Abdul Jabbar, Amit Gupta, Eleanor Barker, Manaf Khatib et al.
Otolaryngology
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
article

A Meta‐analysis of Functional Outcomes and Recovery Metrics Comparing Transoral Robotic Surgery and (Chemo)Radiotherapy

Muzammil Arif Din Abdul Jabbar, Amit Gupta, Eleanor Barker, Manaf Khatib, Simpson Shiu Chung Tam, Anant Patel, George Mochloulis, Nihal Sogandji, Shazia Absar, J. Adam Tooze, Mikesh Kalpesh Patel
article en

Abstract

This review presents the most extensive examination to date of swallowing performance and recovery metrics in controlled trials of transoral robotic surgery versus (chemo)radiotherapy. Our findings show that transoral robotic surgery shows promise in managing difficult anatomical areas and low-grade tumors. However, methodological inconsistencies were noted between included studies, particularly in eligibility criteria and human papillomavirus p16 status. Consensus statements and/or guidelines on stratification and reporting of patients may aid in reducing this heterogeneity, while further randomized controlled trials may improve our understanding and guide the development of clinical guidelines on treatment choice.

OtolaryngologyVol. 174(1)
University of Cambridge (GB), Health First (US), Bridge University (SS), Mount Vernon Cancer Centre (GB), East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust (GB), Public Library of Science (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Head and Neck Cancer Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.