Temporal Preparation and Executive Functions in the Context of a Variable Foreperiod Stop‐Signal Paradigm in Macaque Monkey: Evidence From Bayesian Parametric Approach

The interaction between temporal preparation and response inhibition is poorly understood in primates. Across two experiments, we investigated this relationship in four rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) using a variable foreperiod (FP) stop-signal task, respectively focusing on effects of FP and its repetition/alteration across trials on response inhibition. We estimated ex-Gaussian distribution of reaction time in go trials (Go-RT) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) along with a probability of trigger failure (PTF). In the first experiment, increasing temporal preparation reduced the mean and variability of both the Gaussian and exponential components of Go-RT distribution, indicating generally faster and more consistent responding. In contrast, temporal preparation produced divergent effects on SSRT distribution: it numerically increased the Gaussian mean but decreased the exponential tail and overall variability. At the same time, PTF increased from short to long FP, suggesting that temporal preparation hinders the trigger of inhibition while enhancing its efficacy once triggered. In the second experiment, we found that FP effects on Go-RT distribution were largely independent of FP sequence. By contrast, response inhibition in the Gaussian component and entire distribution was modulated by FP switching: alternation between FPs prolonged inhibition latency. Also, FP switching reduced trigger failure, indicating a sequential adjustment that improved cue detection and reliability of stopping. Together, these findings demonstrate that temporal preparation shapes response execution primarily independent of state of preparation in the preceding trial, whereas its influence on response inhibition reflects short-term influences from the preceding trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Primatology
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.70101
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Temporal Preparation and Executive Functions in the Context of a Variable Foreperiod Stop‐Signal Paradigm in Macaque Monkey: Evidence From Bayesian Parametric Approach

Vahid Sheibani, Fatemeh Mohtashami Borzadaran, Sadegh Ghasemian, Farshad A. Mansouri et al.
American Journal of Primatology
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
article

Temporal Preparation and Executive Functions in the Context of a Variable Foreperiod Stop‐Signal Paradigm in Macaque Monkey: Evidence From Bayesian Parametric Approach

Vahid Sheibani, Fatemeh Mohtashami Borzadaran, Sadegh Ghasemian, Farshad A. Mansouri, Sander A. Los, Elahe Rohani
article en

Abstract

The interaction between temporal preparation and response inhibition is poorly understood in primates. Across two experiments, we investigated this relationship in four rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) using a variable foreperiod (FP) stop-signal task, respectively focusing on effects of FP and its repetition/alteration across trials on response inhibition. We estimated ex-Gaussian distribution of reaction time in go trials (Go-RT) and stop-signal reaction time (SSRT) along with a probability of trigger failure (PTF). In the first experiment, increasing temporal preparation reduced the mean and variability of both the Gaussian and exponential components of Go-RT distribution, indicating generally faster and more consistent responding. In contrast, temporal preparation produced divergent effects on SSRT distribution: it numerically increased the Gaussian mean but decreased the exponential tail and overall variability. At the same time, PTF increased from short to long FP, suggesting that temporal preparation hinders the trigger of inhibition while enhancing its efficacy once triggered. In the second experiment, we found that FP effects on Go-RT distribution were largely independent of FP sequence. By contrast, response inhibition in the Gaussian component and entire distribution was modulated by FP switching: alternation between FPs prolonged inhibition latency. Also, FP switching reduced trigger failure, indicating a sequential adjustment that improved cue detection and reliability of stopping. Together, these findings demonstrate that temporal preparation shapes response execution primarily independent of state of preparation in the preceding trial, whereas its influence on response inhibition reflects short-term influences from the preceding trial.

American Journal of PrimatologyVol. 87(12)
Kerman University of Medical Sciences (IR), Monash University (AU), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.