Virtual Reality vs Traditional Lecture-Based Methods in Radiation Safety Continuing Medical Education.

VR-based CME improved radiation safety knowledge retention and significantly reduced radiation exposure. Its integration into training programs offers a cost-effective and successful approach to advancing safety protocols in clinical practice. Further research is warranted to confirm these outcomes.

Authors

Yui Nakamura (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8497-6435)
A Fujiwara (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-6105-632X)
Hidekazu Takahashi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0779-407X)

Publication Details

Journal: PubMed
Published: 2025-12-05
Primary Topic: Radiology practices and education
Type: article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact: 0.00

Controls

|||

ALL TIME

JAN

FEB

MAR

APR

MAY

JUN

JUL

AUG

SEP

OCT

article

Virtual Reality vs Traditional Lecture-Based Methods in Radiation Safety Continuing Medical Education.

Yui Nakamura, A Fujiwara, Hidekazu Takahashi

Dec 5, 2025

PubMed

Radiology practices and education

article

Virtual Reality vs Traditional Lecture-Based Methods in Radiation Safety Continuing Medical Education.

Yui Nakamura, A Fujiwara, Hidekazu Takahashi

December 5, 2025article en

Abstract

PubMedVol. 97(2)

Openalex Percentile: Top 46%

Radiology practices and education

OpenAlex

AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Virtual Reality vs Traditional Lecture-Based Methods in Radiation Safety Continuing Medical Education. — Yui Nakamura, A Fujiwara, et al. · PubMed (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS