Validation of the metrics properties of ‘UO Pharma’: a new French tool for measuring hospital pharmaceutical activity

Abstract Objectives In the French healthcare system, workload units (UO for ‘unités d’œuvre’) are essential for determining public hospital costs. Historically, ‘UO Pharma’ measured pharmacy activity with a single indicator, i.e. dispensed medication and medical devices, which did not reflect the complexity of hospital pharmacy tasks. A new version, introduced in 2021, adds 43 indicators alongside 14 related to specific activity for more accurate measurement. This study evaluates its validity and reliability. Methods A retrospective observational study analysed 2021 and 2022 UO Pharma data from the national hospital cost accounting database. Descriptive analyses evaluated UO Pharma adoption based on hospital characteristics, regions, and activity levels. Validity was assessed through convergent validity (correlation with hospital bed-days) and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis). Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency and test–retest reliability via intraclass correlation coefficients. Key findings Approximately 20% of eligible hospitals used UO Pharma, with some regional and hospital-type variations. The tool demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.87 in 2021 and 0.89 in 2022), but some dimensions (e.g. medication dispensing) showed lower consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≤ 0.6). Test–retest reliability showed excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90) for 12 of 35 items, with 13 items showing moderate to good reliability (>0.50). Convergent validity was confirmed with a strong correlation (r = 0.84), improving from 2021 (r = 0.26) to 2022 (r = 0.98). Conclusions UO Pharma is a reliable and valid tool. To improve user experience and understanding of some items, we recommend clarifications in the user guide for areas with identified confusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Published
2025-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmaf023
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of the metrics properties of ‘UO Pharma’: a new French tool for measuring hospital pharmaceutical activity

Hélène Eychenié, Gwendoline Felker, Davy Beauger, Stéphane Honoré et al.
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Validation of the metrics properties of ‘UO Pharma’: a new French tool for measuring hospital pharmaceutical activity

Hélène Eychenié, Gwendoline Felker, Davy Beauger, Stéphane Honoré, E. Girard, Catherine Amalric, Olivier Serre, Agnès Teutsch, Diane Paillet
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objectives In the French healthcare system, workload units (UO for ‘unités d’œuvre’) are essential for determining public hospital costs. Historically, ‘UO Pharma’ measured pharmacy activity with a single indicator, i.e. dispensed medication and medical devices, which did not reflect the complexity of hospital pharmacy tasks. A new version, introduced in 2021, adds 43 indicators alongside 14 related to specific activity for more accurate measurement. This study evaluates its validity and reliability. Methods A retrospective observational study analysed 2021 and 2022 UO Pharma data from the national hospital cost accounting database. Descriptive analyses evaluated UO Pharma adoption based on hospital characteristics, regions, and activity levels. Validity was assessed through convergent validity (correlation with hospital bed-days) and construct validity (exploratory factor analysis). Reliability was measured using Cronbach’s alpha for internal consistency and test–retest reliability via intraclass correlation coefficients. Key findings Approximately 20% of eligible hospitals used UO Pharma, with some regional and hospital-type variations. The tool demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha: 0.87 in 2021 and 0.89 in 2022), but some dimensions (e.g. medication dispensing) showed lower consistency (Cronbach’s alpha ≤ 0.6). Test–retest reliability showed excellent reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient > 0.90) for 12 of 35 items, with 13 items showing moderate to good reliability (>0.50). Convergent validity was confirmed with a strong correlation (r = 0.84), improving from 2021 (r = 0.26) to 2022 (r = 0.98). Conclusions UO Pharma is a reliable and valid tool. To improve user experience and understanding of some items, we recommend clarifications in the user guide for areas with identified confusion.

Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services ResearchVol. 16(4)
Ceres (US), Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Agence Nationale de la Recherche (FR), Centre de Recherche sur l'Information Scientifique et Technique (DZ), Laboratoire d'Innovation Thérapeutique (FR), Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Croatia (HR), HCL Technologies (India) (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.