Comparing prognostic significance of dual bolus and dual sequence quantitative stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance
In this blinded comparison, DS stress MBF and MPR demonstrated better prognostication than DB stress MBF and MPR. Our findings support DS as the preferred approach where available.
Authors
- Kwong Yue Eric Chan
- Romelie M Tuplano (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6688-2988)
- Wing Ting Tse (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3439-4338)
- Ming‐Yen Ng (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9533-3892)
- Randall S. Stafford (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1805-1271)
- Konrad Werys (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2334-2359)
- Eric Yuk Fai Wan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6275-1147)
- Cheuk Nam Felix Kwan
- Chun Yu Leung
- Chor Cheung Tam (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4159-7635)
- P. C. Chu
- Christopher Chun Hei Yip (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-8009)
- Haonan Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6963-8987)
- Kwan Ho Gordon Leung (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-1623-8216)
- K Goh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3938-8543)
- Emmy M. Y. Wong (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5291-1937)
- Martin Janich (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2745-3275)
- Tsun Hei Sin
Institutions
- General Electric (Spain) (ES)
- Queen Mary Hospital (CN)
- Tseung Kwan O Hospital (CN)
- Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital (HK)
- Circle Cardiovascular Imaging (CA)
- Queen Mary's Hospital (GB)
- Applied Sciences Laboratory (United States) (US)
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
Publication Details
- Journal
- European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
- Published
- 2025-12-03
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jeaf339
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00