Historic port conservation multi-criteria evaluation based on AHP-TOPSIS: cases from the UK, Spain and China

Through the application of an AHP-TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, this study assesses and compares approaches to heritage conservation strategies for historic ports in the UK (Liverpool), Spain (Cádiz) and China (Quanzhou). With a global importance in maritime history, these ports have seen the same pressures of modernity faced by other areas around the world. This study seeks to make a comparative assessment of the adaptive reuse potential of port heritage areas through combining expert opinions and quantitative analysis. The research proposes four main criteria — historical significance, architectural integrity, economic impact, and cultural engagement process, all of which developed by high-weight sub-criteria. Results emphasize regional variances in conservation practices shaped by local policies and socio-cultural contexts. This research provides an AHP-TOPSIS based framework for decision-makers who work in heritage conservation and which can be used as part in the sustainability of urban development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06071-5
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.27
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Historic port conservation multi-criteria evaluation based on AHP-TOPSIS: cases from the UK, Spain and China

Rui Wang, Farzina Akter, Shuangquan Wang, Feifei Song et al.
1 citations
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
8.27
article

Historic port conservation multi-criteria evaluation based on AHP-TOPSIS: cases from the UK, Spain and China

Rui Wang, Farzina Akter, Shuangquan Wang, Feifei Song, Mostak Ahamed Galib, Zeremariam Yosief Medin
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Through the application of an AHP-TOPSIS multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, this study assesses and compares approaches to heritage conservation strategies for historic ports in the UK (Liverpool), Spain (Cádiz) and China (Quanzhou). With a global importance in maritime history, these ports have seen the same pressures of modernity faced by other areas around the world. This study seeks to make a comparative assessment of the adaptive reuse potential of port heritage areas through combining expert opinions and quantitative analysis. The research proposes four main criteria — historical significance, architectural integrity, economic impact, and cultural engagement process, all of which developed by high-weight sub-criteria. Results emphasize regional variances in conservation practices shaped by local policies and socio-cultural contexts. This research provides an AHP-TOPSIS based framework for decision-makers who work in heritage conservation and which can be used as part in the sustainability of urban development.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 12(1)
Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
8.27
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Historic port conservation multi-criteria evaluation based on AHP-TOPSIS: cases from the UK, Spain and China — Rui Wang, Farzina Akter, et al. · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS