Adoption of Electricity in Rural Rwanda 10 Years after Connection
Power grid extension into hitherto unconnected areas is a key policy goal in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, connection and usage rates remain low in rural grid-covered areas, at least in the short and medium run. This paper provides a long-term follow-up of a large grid extension program in rural Rwanda, analyzing electricity adoption over time in a panel of 41 communities electrified up to ten years ago. Using both survey and administrative data, we find that nearly half of the households in grid-covered communities remain unconnected. Even among those directly under the distribution grid, electrification rates barely exceed 80%. Electricity consumption and appliance use are low and have not increased over time. These findings suggest that, from an economic development or cost-benefit standpoint, rural grid investments are hard to justify. Instead, rights-based arguments centered on equity and fairness may offer a more compelling - albeit more controversial - justification for such investments.
Authors
- Jörg Peters (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-8745)
- Nathaniel J. Williams (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5676-2288)
- Vijay Modi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2513-0437)
- Joel Mugyenyi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5668-9208)
- Lise Masselus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9946-8997)
- Maximiliane Sievert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7797-2559)
- Anicet Munyehirwe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2656-2346)
- Gabriel Gonzalez Sutil
Institutions
- RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research (DE)
- Rochester Institute of Technology (US)
- University of Passau (DE)
- University of Kigali (RW)
- Rwanda Biomedical Center (RW)
- Columbia University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-12-07
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-025-66986-0
- Primary Topic
- Energy and Environment Impacts
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists