Local field potentials survey to guide DBS programming in Parkinson’s disease: a clinical-neurophysiological longitudinal study

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) programming in Parkinson's disease relies on clinical evaluation, yet beta-band activity in local field potentials (LFPs) may offer objective guidance. We evaluated LFP-guided contact selection against clinical programming (CP) at initial monopolar review and long-term follow-up. Bipolar LFPs were recorded in patients with sensing-enabled DBS systems, where central levels were clinically chosen. Three methods based on beta peak amplitude were tested: Broad-Bipolar (non-adjacent rings), Narrow-Bipolar (contiguous rings), and Segment-Bipolar (horizontal segments). Performance was assessed using correlation, agreement, and selection similarity with CP and compared to random selection. Narrow-Bipolar showed the strongest correlation and agreement with CP at both timepoints, outperforming other methods and random selection. It showed the greatest selection stability over time and the highest prediction. Its performance was comparable to imaging-guided programming and did not differ between STN and GPi. These results support Narrow-Bipolar as a valid, easy-to-perform beta-based method for guiding DBS programming.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
npj Parkinson s Disease
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41531-025-01208-4
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Neurological disorders and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local field potentials survey to guide DBS programming in Parkinson’s disease: a clinical-neurophysiological longitudinal study

Camillo Porcaro, Valentina D’Onofrio, Angelo Antonini, Leonardo Rigon et al.
2 citations
npj Parkinson s Disease
Neurological disorders and treatments
2.78
article

Local field potentials survey to guide DBS programming in Parkinson’s disease: a clinical-neurophysiological longitudinal study

Camillo Porcaro, Valentina D’Onofrio, Angelo Antonini, Leonardo Rigon, Luca Weis, Gerd Tinkhauser, L. Grassi, Andrea Guerra, Andrea Landi, Dario Ciprietti
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) programming in Parkinson's disease relies on clinical evaluation, yet beta-band activity in local field potentials (LFPs) may offer objective guidance. We evaluated LFP-guided contact selection against clinical programming (CP) at initial monopolar review and long-term follow-up. Bipolar LFPs were recorded in patients with sensing-enabled DBS systems, where central levels were clinically chosen. Three methods based on beta peak amplitude were tested: Broad-Bipolar (non-adjacent rings), Narrow-Bipolar (contiguous rings), and Segment-Bipolar (horizontal segments). Performance was assessed using correlation, agreement, and selection similarity with CP and compared to random selection. Narrow-Bipolar showed the strongest correlation and agreement with CP at both timepoints, outperforming other methods and random selection. It showed the greatest selection stability over time and the highest prediction. Its performance was comparable to imaging-guided programming and did not differ between STN and GPi. These results support Narrow-Bipolar as a valid, easy-to-perform beta-based method for guiding DBS programming.

npj Parkinson s DiseaseVol. 12(1)
University of Bern (CH), University of Padua (IT), University Hospital of Bern (CH), IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT), Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies (IT), University of Birmingham (GB)
National Science Foundation, Boston Scientific Corporation, European Commission, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca, Parkinson Vereniging
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Neurological disorders and treatments
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.