Predictors of true appendicitis in pregnancy: a pathology-based 10-year cohort study

To evaluate the diagnostic value of physical examination, ultrasonography (USG), and white blood cell (WBC) count in pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis and to determine which parameters are most significant in differentiating true appendicitis from non-appendicitis cases. This hospital-based study involved pregnant women who underwent surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. Data were collected from patient records, including physical examination findings, USG results, WBC counts, intraoperative and pathological findings, and hospital stay duration. Patients were divided into two groups based on pathological diagnosis: those with confirmed appendicitis and those without. A total of 106 pregnant women were included in the study. Physical examination revealed that rebound and defense signs were significantly higher in the appendicitis group (p < 0.001). USG correctly diagnosed appendicitis in 66% of cases in the appendicitis group compared to 28% in the non-appendicitis group (p = 0.003). The mean WBC count was significantly higher in the appendicitis group (14.30 ± 4.77) than in the non-appendicitis group (12.37 ± 4.29) (p = 0.040). The average length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups. Physical examination, USG, and WBC count are valuable diagnostic tools in differentiating true appendicitis from non-appendicitis cases in pregnant patients. Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention can significantly reduce the risk of complications. However, a thorough evaluation is essential to minimize the risk of negative exploration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Surgery
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-025-03419-1
Primary Topic
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictors of true appendicitis in pregnancy: a pathology-based 10-year cohort study

Mahmut Gumus, Alper Aytekin, Aziz Bulut, İbrahim Taşkum et al.
BMC Surgery
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
article

Predictors of true appendicitis in pregnancy: a pathology-based 10-year cohort study

Mahmut Gumus, Alper Aytekin, Aziz Bulut, İbrahim Taşkum, Mustafa Yılmaz, Muhammed Hanifi Bademkıran, Latif Yılmaz
article en

Abstract

To evaluate the diagnostic value of physical examination, ultrasonography (USG), and white blood cell (WBC) count in pregnant patients with suspected acute appendicitis and to determine which parameters are most significant in differentiating true appendicitis from non-appendicitis cases. This hospital-based study involved pregnant women who underwent surgery for suspected acute appendicitis. Data were collected from patient records, including physical examination findings, USG results, WBC counts, intraoperative and pathological findings, and hospital stay duration. Patients were divided into two groups based on pathological diagnosis: those with confirmed appendicitis and those without. A total of 106 pregnant women were included in the study. Physical examination revealed that rebound and defense signs were significantly higher in the appendicitis group (p < 0.001). USG correctly diagnosed appendicitis in 66% of cases in the appendicitis group compared to 28% in the non-appendicitis group (p = 0.003). The mean WBC count was significantly higher in the appendicitis group (14.30 ± 4.77) than in the non-appendicitis group (12.37 ± 4.29) (p = 0.040). The average length of hospital stay did not significantly differ between the two groups. Physical examination, USG, and WBC count are valuable diagnostic tools in differentiating true appendicitis from non-appendicitis cases in pregnant patients. Early diagnosis and timely surgical intervention can significantly reduce the risk of complications. However, a thorough evaluation is essential to minimize the risk of negative exploration.

BMC SurgeryVol. 25(1)
Sivas State Hospital (TR), Mersin Üniversitesi (TR), Gaziantep University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Appendicitis Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.