Plasma proteomics to explore benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 in advanced solid tumors: a prospective pilot study

Anti-PD-(L)1 therapies are widely used for the treatment of distinct cancers, but the proportion of patients who benefit from the treatment remains low, and tools for patient selection are suboptimal. In this study, we investigated whether plasma proteomics could explore the benefit of anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies. This prospective study enrolled 56 patients with multiple solid tumor types treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Pre-treatment plasma samples were profiled with a 92-plex immuno-oncology proximity extension assay panel. Associations with radiographic outcomes and survival were examined. Prediction models for ORR, DCR and OS were evaluated. Analyses were performed in a pooled hypothesis-generating framework. Several proteins, including ADGRG1 and ARG1, were linked to radiographic response. ARG1 achieved ROC-AUCs 0.68 (ORR) and 0.53 (DCR). We generated machine learning models for predicting both radiographic responses and long-term survival (≥ 720 days). For overall survival, the six-protein Cox proportional model separated risk groups (hazard ratio (HR) 4.8; CI 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–10.9), while larger panels increased separation, they are prone to over-fit and require validation. Unsupervised clustering did not show dominant segregation by tumor type. Our findings from this small prospective heterogeneous cohort support that plasma proteomics show promising but preliminary results in predicting the benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in multiple advanced solid tumors. Findings regarding DCR and ORR modeling should be interpreted as exploratory and require external validation, both tumor-specific and pan-cancer, before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-31229-1
Primary Topic
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Plasma proteomics to explore benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 in advanced solid tumors: a prospective pilot study

Sanna Iivanainen, Jussi Pekka Koivunen, Peeter Karihtala, Sirpa Leppä et al.
Scientific Reports
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
article

Plasma proteomics to explore benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 in advanced solid tumors: a prospective pilot study

Sanna Iivanainen, Jussi Pekka Koivunen, Peeter Karihtala, Sirpa Leppä, Antti Tikkanen
article en

Abstract

Anti-PD-(L)1 therapies are widely used for the treatment of distinct cancers, but the proportion of patients who benefit from the treatment remains low, and tools for patient selection are suboptimal. In this study, we investigated whether plasma proteomics could explore the benefit of anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies. This prospective study enrolled 56 patients with multiple solid tumor types treated with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies. Pre-treatment plasma samples were profiled with a 92-plex immuno-oncology proximity extension assay panel. Associations with radiographic outcomes and survival were examined. Prediction models for ORR, DCR and OS were evaluated. Analyses were performed in a pooled hypothesis-generating framework. Several proteins, including ADGRG1 and ARG1, were linked to radiographic response. ARG1 achieved ROC-AUCs 0.68 (ORR) and 0.53 (DCR). We generated machine learning models for predicting both radiographic responses and long-term survival (≥ 720 days). For overall survival, the six-protein Cox proportional model separated risk groups (hazard ratio (HR) 4.8; CI 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.1–10.9), while larger panels increased separation, they are prone to over-fit and require validation. Unsupervised clustering did not show dominant segregation by tumor type. Our findings from this small prospective heterogeneous cohort support that plasma proteomics show promising but preliminary results in predicting the benefit from anti-PD-(L)1 therapies in multiple advanced solid tumors. Findings regarding DCR and ORR modeling should be interpreted as exploratory and require external validation, both tumor-specific and pan-cancer, before clinical application.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
University of Helsinki (FI), Oulu University Hospital (FI), Helsinki University Hospital (FI), Kajaani University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Oulu (FI)
Ida Montinin Säätiö, Suomen Lääketieteen Säätiö, Suomen Kulttuurirahasto, Emil Aaltosen Säätiö, Syöpäsäätiö
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.