Clinical outcomes and predictive factors of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases: a comparative study

Brain metastases (BMs) are common in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and remain a major therapeutic challenge. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved systemic outcomes, their intracranial efficacy and prognostic determinants in patients with BMs, particularly in comparison with chemotherapy, remains insufficiently characterized. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including NSCLC patients with BMs who received ICIs or chemotherapy alone. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics between treatment groups. Intracranial and extracranial responses, intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial PFS (ePFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors associated with treatment response and survival. In the matched cohort, patients treated with immunotherapy achieved significantly longer median OS than those receiving chemotherapy (18.9 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.001), while intracranial and extracranial PFS were not significantly prolonged (median iPFS: 10.4 vs. 9.6 months, p = 0.09; median ePFS: 7.8 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.06). In the intracranial efficacy–evaluable cohort, the intracranial objective response rate (iORR) was 38.9% vs. 35.2% (p = 0.759), whereas the extracranial objective response rate (eORR) was 45.9% vs. 18.0% (p = 0.006), favoring immunotherapy. Concordance between intracranial and extracranial responses was about 70% across groups. In the immunotherapy cohort, development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), receipt of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), and prior radiotherapy were associated with improved OS. Patients receiving intracranial radiotherapy before ICIs achieved a median OS of 32.3 months versus 19.0 months with concurrent therapy. In the chemotherapy cohort, age ≥ 65 years and multiple brain metastases were associated with inferior survival. This real-world study suggests that immunotherapy may confer a survival advantage over chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastases, with efficacy less dependent on baseline factors such as age or performance status. Radiotherapy administered before ICIs appeared to be associated with favorable outcomes, although this observation remains hypothesis-generating given the study limitations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Cancer
Published
2025-12-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-025-15327-x
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes and predictive factors of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases: a comparative study

Minjiang Chen, Yuequan Shi, Yan Xu, Xiaoyan Liu et al.
BMC Cancer
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

Clinical outcomes and predictive factors of immunotherapy efficacy in non-small-cell lung cancer brain metastases: a comparative study

Minjiang Chen, Yuequan Shi, Yan Xu, Xiaoyan Liu, Jing Zhao, Mengzhao Wang, Yong Wei, Rongzhen Li
article en

Abstract

Brain metastases (BMs) are common in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and remain a major therapeutic challenge. While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have improved systemic outcomes, their intracranial efficacy and prognostic determinants in patients with BMs, particularly in comparison with chemotherapy, remains insufficiently characterized. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including NSCLC patients with BMs who received ICIs or chemotherapy alone. Propensity score matching was performed to balance baseline characteristics between treatment groups. Intracranial and extracranial responses, intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), extracranial PFS (ePFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify prognostic factors associated with treatment response and survival. In the matched cohort, patients treated with immunotherapy achieved significantly longer median OS than those receiving chemotherapy (18.9 vs. 13.3 months, p = 0.001), while intracranial and extracranial PFS were not significantly prolonged (median iPFS: 10.4 vs. 9.6 months, p = 0.09; median ePFS: 7.8 vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.06). In the intracranial efficacy–evaluable cohort, the intracranial objective response rate (iORR) was 38.9% vs. 35.2% (p = 0.759), whereas the extracranial objective response rate (eORR) was 45.9% vs. 18.0% (p = 0.006), favoring immunotherapy. Concordance between intracranial and extracranial responses was about 70% across groups. In the immunotherapy cohort, development of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), receipt of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), and prior radiotherapy were associated with improved OS. Patients receiving intracranial radiotherapy before ICIs achieved a median OS of 32.3 months versus 19.0 months with concurrent therapy. In the chemotherapy cohort, age ≥ 65 years and multiple brain metastases were associated with inferior survival. This real-world study suggests that immunotherapy may confer a survival advantage over chemotherapy in NSCLC patients with brain metastases, with efficacy less dependent on baseline factors such as age or performance status. Radiotherapy administered before ICIs appeared to be associated with favorable outcomes, although this observation remains hypothesis-generating given the study limitations.

BMC CancerVol. 26(1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.