Physics-informed deep learning for groundwater contamination sources identification under sparse monitoring

• A physics-informed deep learning framework was developed for source identification. • Sparse multi-temporal head and concentration data were integrated with physical priors. • Simulation and field-based cases demonstrated accurate source localization (∼20 m). • Robustness analysis showed resilience to strong monitoring noise (∼30 m). • The framework supports sustainable groundwater risk assessment and remediation planning. Groundwater contamination poses persistent risks to environmental and public health, especially in industrial regions where monitoring networks are sparse and uncertain. Source identification is critical for effective remediation and risk management but is hindered by aquifer heterogeneity and limited observations. A physics-informed deep learning framework is proposed that integrates spatial encoding, recurrent temporal modules, and probabilistic outputs to reconstruct source location, release timing, and release intensity from sparse multi-temporal data. Hydraulic and concentration gradients were explicitly embedded as physical features, improving interpretability and stability of the inversion. In simulation cases, the framework localized sources with mean spatial errors of ∼20 m and yielded reliable estimates of release parameters (release time R 2 = 0.94, RMSE = 3.84–3.87 days; concentration R 2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.61 mg/L). Field-based cases which adopted actual facility layouts and monitoring networks further demonstrated its applicability under realistic hydrogeological settings (spatial error 0.64 grids, 20.09 m; release time R 2 = 0.91, RMSE = 4.64 days; concentration R 2 = 0.82, RMSE = 1.11 mg/L). Robustness analyses confirmed resilience to observational noise and irregular sampling, with combined perturbations (σ h = 0.5–1 m, σ c = 1–2 mg/L) keeping spatial error 20–22 m, release time R 2 > 0.92 and concentration R 2 > 0.76. These results show that physics-informed learning can enable rapid and reliable groundwater contamination source identification even with sparse monitoring. The proposed framework offers a practical tool to support environmental management and remediation planning in complex contaminated sites.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Hydrology
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2025.134691
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.80
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physics-informed deep learning for groundwater contamination sources identification under sparse monitoring

Zhenyu Ding, Xueying Qiao, Xiaohong Peng, Liming Zhang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Hydrology
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.80
article

Physics-informed deep learning for groundwater contamination sources identification under sparse monitoring

Zhenyu Ding, Xueying Qiao, Xiaohong Peng, Liming Zhang, Zongwen Zhang, Zhaoqian Xie, Jiawen Liu, D. M. Mei, Ning Sun
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• A physics-informed deep learning framework was developed for source identification. • Sparse multi-temporal head and concentration data were integrated with physical priors. • Simulation and field-based cases demonstrated accurate source localization (∼20 m). • Robustness analysis showed resilience to strong monitoring noise (∼30 m). • The framework supports sustainable groundwater risk assessment and remediation planning. Groundwater contamination poses persistent risks to environmental and public health, especially in industrial regions where monitoring networks are sparse and uncertain. Source identification is critical for effective remediation and risk management but is hindered by aquifer heterogeneity and limited observations. A physics-informed deep learning framework is proposed that integrates spatial encoding, recurrent temporal modules, and probabilistic outputs to reconstruct source location, release timing, and release intensity from sparse multi-temporal data. Hydraulic and concentration gradients were explicitly embedded as physical features, improving interpretability and stability of the inversion. In simulation cases, the framework localized sources with mean spatial errors of ∼20 m and yielded reliable estimates of release parameters (release time R 2 = 0.94, RMSE = 3.84–3.87 days; concentration R 2 = 0.95, RMSE = 0.61 mg/L). Field-based cases which adopted actual facility layouts and monitoring networks further demonstrated its applicability under realistic hydrogeological settings (spatial error 0.64 grids, 20.09 m; release time R 2 = 0.91, RMSE = 4.64 days; concentration R 2 = 0.82, RMSE = 1.11 mg/L). Robustness analyses confirmed resilience to observational noise and irregular sampling, with combined perturbations (σ h = 0.5–1 m, σ c = 1–2 mg/L) keeping spatial error 20–22 m, release time R 2 > 0.92 and concentration R 2 > 0.76. These results show that physics-informed learning can enable rapid and reliable groundwater contamination source identification even with sparse monitoring. The proposed framework offers a practical tool to support environmental management and remediation planning in complex contaminated sites.

Journal of HydrologyVol. 665
Jiangsu University (CN), China University of Geosciences (CN), State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse (CN), Ganzhou People's Hospital (CN), Chinese Academy for Environmental Planning (CN), Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (CN), Nanjing University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Groundwater flow and contamination studies
0.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.