Female leadership and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from China

This study investigates the impact of female leadership on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating disagreement among Chinese listed companies from 2015 to 2023. We find that female leadership significantly mitigate ESG rating disagreement. These findings remain robust after conducting a range of tests to solve the issue of selection bias and reverse causality. The role of female leadership in mitigating ESG disagreement is attributed to three aspects, such as the promotion in environmental investment (E), the improvement of customer protection (S), and the enhancement in corporate internal governance (G). The curbing impact of female leadership on ESG rating disagreement is more pronounced for non-state-owned firms, firms in low-pollution industries, firms located in eastern regions, and firms at earlier life-cycle stages. These results may reflect that female leaders exert different governance effects under varying institutional environments, market pressures, industry characteristics, and stages of corporate development. Our study contributes to the literature on the role of female leadership in corporate governance and sustainable development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30948-9
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Female leadership and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from China

Wei Liao, Shuangyi Chen
Scientific Reports
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Female leadership and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from China

Wei Liao, Shuangyi Chen
article en

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of female leadership on ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) rating disagreement among Chinese listed companies from 2015 to 2023. We find that female leadership significantly mitigate ESG rating disagreement. These findings remain robust after conducting a range of tests to solve the issue of selection bias and reverse causality. The role of female leadership in mitigating ESG disagreement is attributed to three aspects, such as the promotion in environmental investment (E), the improvement of customer protection (S), and the enhancement in corporate internal governance (G). The curbing impact of female leadership on ESG rating disagreement is more pronounced for non-state-owned firms, firms in low-pollution industries, firms located in eastern regions, and firms at earlier life-cycle stages. These results may reflect that female leaders exert different governance effects under varying institutional environments, market pressures, industry characteristics, and stages of corporate development. Our study contributes to the literature on the role of female leadership in corporate governance and sustainable development.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
The University of Sydney (AU), Jinan University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Female leadership and ESG rating disagreement: Evidence from China — Wei Liao, Shuangyi Chen · Scientific Reports (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS