Socioeconomic advantage as protection from genetic mental health risks

The burden of mental illness is unequally distributed, with higher prevalence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals and those with a genetic predisposition to mental illness. Using data from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we examine whether childhood socioeconomic status (SES) moderates the association between genetic predisposition - measured using polygenic indices (PGIs) - and adult mental health. We document a childhood SES gradient in the association between genetic risk and anxiety, but not depression. Specifically, individuals who report having been financially well-off during childhood or whose fathers held relatively higher prestige occupations exhibit a substantially weaker association between the anxiety PGI and anxiety symptoms in adulthood. This pattern is not explained by differences in parenting style, parent-child relationship quality, or exposure to childhood stressors and traumas. These findings contribute to the literature on gene-environment interplay by documenting heterogeneity in the association between genetic predisposition and mental health outcomes across socioeconomic contexts. To the extent that financial resources moderate the association between genetic risk and anxiety, early-life economic conditions may be associated with differences in the manifestation of genetic predispositions, with implications for understanding inequalities in mental health.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118845
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Socioeconomic advantage as protection from genetic mental health risks

Sonja C. de New, Charlene A. Wong, John P. Haisken‐DeNew, Nicolau Martin‐Bassols
Social Science & Medicine
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Socioeconomic advantage as protection from genetic mental health risks

Sonja C. de New, Charlene A. Wong, John P. Haisken‐DeNew, Nicolau Martin‐Bassols
article en

Abstract

The burden of mental illness is unequally distributed, with higher prevalence among socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals and those with a genetic predisposition to mental illness. Using data from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study (HRS), we examine whether childhood socioeconomic status (SES) moderates the association between genetic predisposition - measured using polygenic indices (PGIs) - and adult mental health. We document a childhood SES gradient in the association between genetic risk and anxiety, but not depression. Specifically, individuals who report having been financially well-off during childhood or whose fathers held relatively higher prestige occupations exhibit a substantially weaker association between the anxiety PGI and anxiety symptoms in adulthood. This pattern is not explained by differences in parenting style, parent-child relationship quality, or exposure to childhood stressors and traumas. These findings contribute to the literature on gene-environment interplay by documenting heterogeneity in the association between genetic predisposition and mental health outcomes across socioeconomic contexts. To the extent that financial resources moderate the association between genetic risk and anxiety, early-life economic conditions may be associated with differences in the manifestation of genetic predispositions, with implications for understanding inequalities in mental health.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 391
Deakin University (AU), IZA - Institute of Labor Economics (DE), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU), Monash Institute of Medical Research (AU), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.