The Role of Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension in Canada: A Case-Based Discussion from the Canadian Hypertension Specialists Society

Over one-third of Canadians with hypertension do not achieve recommended blood pressure (BP) targets despite availability of effective treatments. Renal sympathetic nerve denervation (RDN) is a recently approved, minimally invasive treatment for hypertension being offered in multiple Canadian centers. How best to implement this procedure in contemporary Canadian clinical practice remains unclear. Herein, we provide a Canadian hypertension specialist viewpoint on use of RDN in Canada. We review the rationale for, and evidence supporting, the use of RDN and discuss, using two clinical cases, its potential therapeutic role. We note that RDN has effectively lowered BP in multiple, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trials and has a favourable safety profile. Economic modeling estimates that it is cost-effective in the Canadian context. Conversely, the BP lowering effect is relatively modest; no well-established method to pre-identify responders exists; cardiovascular endpoint data supporting use of RDN are lacking; and no clear funding model is currently in place in Canada. Accordingly, we suggest that use of RDN be reserved for willing patients with severely elevated BP despite the use of first-line conventional therapies who have had secondary causes excluded. Examples include patients with resistant hypertension or moderate or severe hypertension and multiple drug intolerance syndrome. In view of its recent approval and known operator-dependency, RDN should be offered solely through programmatic, multidisciplinary collaboration between hypertension specialists and experienced interventionalists using a shared decision-making approach with the patient. Funding deployment should target such programs and sites should carefully monitor their outcomes to confirm comparability to the published literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Hypertension
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ajh/hpaf236
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension in Canada: A Case-Based Discussion from the Canadian Hypertension Specialists Society

Jennifer Ringrose, Bhanu Prasad, Karen C. Tran, Lindsay Machan et al.
American Journal of Hypertension
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
article

The Role of Renal Denervation in the Treatment of Hypertension in Canada: A Case-Based Discussion from the Canadian Hypertension Specialists Society

Jennifer Ringrose, Bhanu Prasad, Karen C. Tran, Lindsay Machan, Sheldon W. Tobe, Nadia Khan, Ernesto L. Schiffrin, Michael P. Dorsch, Lisa Dubrofsky, Mina Madan, Alexander A. C. Leung, Raj Padwal, Ross D. Feldman
article en

Abstract

Over one-third of Canadians with hypertension do not achieve recommended blood pressure (BP) targets despite availability of effective treatments. Renal sympathetic nerve denervation (RDN) is a recently approved, minimally invasive treatment for hypertension being offered in multiple Canadian centers. How best to implement this procedure in contemporary Canadian clinical practice remains unclear. Herein, we provide a Canadian hypertension specialist viewpoint on use of RDN in Canada. We review the rationale for, and evidence supporting, the use of RDN and discuss, using two clinical cases, its potential therapeutic role. We note that RDN has effectively lowered BP in multiple, sham-controlled, randomized clinical trials and has a favourable safety profile. Economic modeling estimates that it is cost-effective in the Canadian context. Conversely, the BP lowering effect is relatively modest; no well-established method to pre-identify responders exists; cardiovascular endpoint data supporting use of RDN are lacking; and no clear funding model is currently in place in Canada. Accordingly, we suggest that use of RDN be reserved for willing patients with severely elevated BP despite the use of first-line conventional therapies who have had secondary causes excluded. Examples include patients with resistant hypertension or moderate or severe hypertension and multiple drug intolerance syndrome. In view of its recent approval and known operator-dependency, RDN should be offered solely through programmatic, multidisciplinary collaboration between hypertension specialists and experienced interventionalists using a shared decision-making approach with the patient. Funding deployment should target such programs and sites should carefully monitor their outcomes to confirm comparability to the published literature.

American Journal of Hypertension
Western University (CA), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), University of British Columbia (CA), University of Alberta (CA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), South Health Campus (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), Jewish General Hospital (CA), Health Sciences Centre (CA), Regina General Hospital (CA), Hypertension Institute (US), McGill University (CA), NOSM University (CA)
University of Toronto
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.