Untangling pathways from digital instructional leadership to AI pedagogy: a diffusion of innovation theory perspective

Drawing on Diffusion of Innovation Theory, this empirical study examines how digital instructional leadership impacts the integration of AI and AI pedagogy in K-12 schools. In addition, the study examines how trust in AI moderates the relationship between AI integration and AI pedagogy. To achieve this goal, a large-scale cross-sectional survey was administered to 842 K-12 teachers in Taiwan who had prior experience integrating AI tools into their classroom instruction. The data were analyzed using SPSS and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results show that digital instructional leadership significantly predicts AI integration but has no direct effect on AI pedagogy. In addition, AI integration strongly predicts AI pedagogy and mediates the relationship between digital instructional leadership and AI pedagogy, whereas trust in AI does not moderate the relationship between AI integration and AI pedagogy. Both theoretical and practical contributions are discussed, offering insights for future research, policymakers, and teachers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03792-9
Primary Topic
Teaching and Learning Programming
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Untangling pathways from digital instructional leadership to AI pedagogy: a diffusion of innovation theory perspective

Hui‐Chieh Li, Sandrotua Bali, Chi‐Jia Hsieh
BMC Psychology
Teaching and Learning Programming
article

Untangling pathways from digital instructional leadership to AI pedagogy: a diffusion of innovation theory perspective

Hui‐Chieh Li, Sandrotua Bali, Chi‐Jia Hsieh
article en

Abstract

Drawing on Diffusion of Innovation Theory, this empirical study examines how digital instructional leadership impacts the integration of AI and AI pedagogy in K-12 schools. In addition, the study examines how trust in AI moderates the relationship between AI integration and AI pedagogy. To achieve this goal, a large-scale cross-sectional survey was administered to 842 K-12 teachers in Taiwan who had prior experience integrating AI tools into their classroom instruction. The data were analyzed using SPSS and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). Results show that digital instructional leadership significantly predicts AI integration but has no direct effect on AI pedagogy. In addition, AI integration strongly predicts AI pedagogy and mediates the relationship between digital instructional leadership and AI pedagogy, whereas trust in AI does not moderate the relationship between AI integration and AI pedagogy. Both theoretical and practical contributions are discussed, offering insights for future research, policymakers, and teachers.

BMC PsychologyVol. 14(1)
National Tsing Hua University (TW), National Taipei University of Business (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Teaching and Learning Programming
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Untangling pathways from digital instructional leadership to AI pedagogy: a diffusion of innovation theory perspective — Hui‐Chieh Li, Sandrotua Bali, et al. · BMC Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS