An investigation of race bias in deep learning-based segmentation of prostate MRI images

Deep learning (DL) has been proposed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate segmentation for various clinical tasks, including radiotherapy treatment planning. In other applications, DL models have exhibited performance bias by protected attributes such as race. To investigate possible race bias in prostate MRI segmentation, DL models were trained on five clinical T2-weighted MRI datasets with varying White/Black race imbalance, plus one public dataset with unknown races, and evaluated on 32 White/Black matched clinical subjects. For the models trained with differing levels of race imbalance, the best performance for both races was when the training set was race-balanced. A linear mixed-effects model analysis showed that Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) differences between Black and White subjects depended on race representation in the training data, with a slight reduction in White-Black performance gap as Black representation increased (p < 0.05). The model trained on public data showed no difference in performance between races for DSC. The findings reveal the potential for race bias in DL prostate MRI segmentation performance when training sets are highly imbalanced. We argue for transparency in race reporting in DL prostate segmentation training data and reporting of test performance across demographic groups, with appropriate ethical/legal safeguards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-26189-5
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An investigation of race bias in deep learning-based segmentation of prostate MRI images

Vinod Mullassery, Stephen Morris, Maram Alqarni, Andrew P. King et al.
Scientific Reports
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

An investigation of race bias in deep learning-based segmentation of prostate MRI images

Vinod Mullassery, Stephen Morris, Maram Alqarni, Andrew P. King, Teresa Guerrero Urbano, Emma Jones, Luı́s Ribeiro, Sian Cooper, Hema Verma
article en

Abstract

Deep learning (DL) has been proposed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) prostate segmentation for various clinical tasks, including radiotherapy treatment planning. In other applications, DL models have exhibited performance bias by protected attributes such as race. To investigate possible race bias in prostate MRI segmentation, DL models were trained on five clinical T2-weighted MRI datasets with varying White/Black race imbalance, plus one public dataset with unknown races, and evaluated on 32 White/Black matched clinical subjects. For the models trained with differing levels of race imbalance, the best performance for both races was when the training set was race-balanced. A linear mixed-effects model analysis showed that Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) differences between Black and White subjects depended on race representation in the training data, with a slight reduction in White-Black performance gap as Black representation increased (p < 0.05). The model trained on public data showed no difference in performance between races for DSC. The findings reveal the potential for race bias in DL prostate MRI segmentation performance when training sets are highly imbalanced. We argue for transparency in race reporting in DL prostate segmentation training data and reporting of test performance across demographic groups, with appropriate ethical/legal safeguards.

Scientific ReportsVol. 15(1)
Guy's Hospital (GB), King's College London (GB), Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King's College School (GB), Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University (SA)
Saudi Arabia Cultural Bureau in London, Cancer Research UK
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.