Anti-Americanism and foreign aid preferences among political elites: Evidence from Tunisia

Abstract International aid is a key resource for local development, and project implementation is influenced by local political elites. However, we know little about how these elites view aid and whether they are more likely to prefer some funding sources over others. We explore elite attitudes toward aid in Tunisia, arguing that local politicians are less likely to prefer development programs funded by the United States compared to other domestic or foreign sources. Through a conjoint experiment embedded in a survey of local Tunisian politicians, we find a strong aversion to local development projects funded by USAID. Analysis of subgroup effects and comparisons to other international donors suggests the negative reaction is driven by ideological rather than material concerns. This research provides insights into elite perceptions of foreign aid in recipient countries and contributes to our understanding of how anti-Americanism can affect policymaking in the Middle East.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Review of International Organizations
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11558-025-09611-5
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anti-Americanism and foreign aid preferences among political elites: Evidence from Tunisia

Scott Williamson, Alexandra Domike Blackman, Aytuğ Şaşmaz, Renu Singh
The Review of International Organizations
International Development and Aid
article

Anti-Americanism and foreign aid preferences among political elites: Evidence from Tunisia

Scott Williamson, Alexandra Domike Blackman, Aytuğ Şaşmaz, Renu Singh
article en

Abstract

Abstract International aid is a key resource for local development, and project implementation is influenced by local political elites. However, we know little about how these elites view aid and whether they are more likely to prefer some funding sources over others. We explore elite attitudes toward aid in Tunisia, arguing that local politicians are less likely to prefer development programs funded by the United States compared to other domestic or foreign sources. Through a conjoint experiment embedded in a survey of local Tunisian politicians, we find a strong aversion to local development projects funded by USAID. Analysis of subgroup effects and comparisons to other international donors suggests the negative reaction is driven by ideological rather than material concerns. This research provides insights into elite perceptions of foreign aid in recipient countries and contributes to our understanding of how anti-Americanism can affect policymaking in the Middle East.

The Review of International Organizations
Bryn Mawr College (US), Durham University (GB), Cornell University (US), University of Oxford (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
International Development and Aid
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.