Parliamentary Size Reduction and Candidate Selection: Evidence from Italy

Scientific literature has long emphasised parliamentary size as a fundamental feature of democratic systems, shaping both party dynamics and representation. However, the consequences of reducing the number of Members of Parliament (MPs) on party strategies for candidate selection remain underexplored. This study examines the case of Italy’s 2019 parliamentary downsizing to investigate how parties adapted their candidate placement strategies, with particular attention to incumbents and female candidates. Leveraging data from pre- and post-reform elections and applying an original measure of candidate list position relevance, the analysis reveals that parties were more likely to allocate incumbents to electorally advantageous positions after the reduction. By contrast, the reform had limited direct effects on the placement of female candidates – likely due to existing gender parity regulations that already structured party behaviour. At the same time, the interaction between gender and incumbency, while not reaching conventional levels of statistical significance, points to a suggestive pattern whereby female incumbents appear less advantaged than their male counterparts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Representation
Published
2025-12-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00344893.2025.2596989
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Parliamentary Size Reduction and Candidate Selection: Evidence from Italy

Matteo Boldrini
Representation
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Parliamentary Size Reduction and Candidate Selection: Evidence from Italy

Matteo Boldrini
article en

Abstract

Scientific literature has long emphasised parliamentary size as a fundamental feature of democratic systems, shaping both party dynamics and representation. However, the consequences of reducing the number of Members of Parliament (MPs) on party strategies for candidate selection remain underexplored. This study examines the case of Italy’s 2019 parliamentary downsizing to investigate how parties adapted their candidate placement strategies, with particular attention to incumbents and female candidates. Leveraging data from pre- and post-reform elections and applying an original measure of candidate list position relevance, the analysis reveals that parties were more likely to allocate incumbents to electorally advantageous positions after the reduction. By contrast, the reform had limited direct effects on the placement of female candidates – likely due to existing gender parity regulations that already structured party behaviour. At the same time, the interaction between gender and incumbency, while not reaching conventional levels of statistical significance, points to a suggestive pattern whereby female incumbents appear less advantaged than their male counterparts.

Representation
University of Siena (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.