Distance mapping for quantifying contact surface area and inter-bone distance in wrist CT imaging: a comparative study of four methods

When assessing osteoarthritis, the congruency of articular surfaces and cartilage integrity are crucial. Static or dynamic CT scanning and subsequent bone-to-bone distance mapping enables a non-invasive evaluation of these factors. Distance maps visualize local inter-bone distances and its extent can serve as a representation of the contact surface area within a joint. A contact surface area can be defined by applying distance and angle thresholds between adjacent bones. These thresholds may affect the selected contact area and therefore influence distance measures. Several methods for distance map generation use different distance measurement approaches, with or without an angle threshold. The impact of the chosen method and thresholds remains unclear. This study evaluates the sensitivity to threshold settings of different methods in radioscaphoid, radiolunate, and scapholunate joints. Static 3D-CT scans of twenty healthy and eleven pathological wrists were analyzed. A mixed effect model was conducted to compare the sensitivity of different methods using particular angle and distance thresholds. The method combining perpendicular distance and angle thresholds was shown to be the least sensitive to changing threshold values, resulting in the smallest variations in observed contact surface area and bone-to-bone distances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-30785-w
Primary Topic
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distance mapping for quantifying contact surface area and inter-bone distance in wrist CT imaging: a comparative study of four methods

Sjoerd H. den Uil, Martijn Baas, Liron S. Duraku, Geert J. Streekstra et al.
Scientific Reports
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
article

Distance mapping for quantifying contact surface area and inter-bone distance in wrist CT imaging: a comparative study of four methods

Sjoerd H. den Uil, Martijn Baas, Liron S. Duraku, Geert J. Streekstra, Johannes G. G. Dobbe, Charlotte M. Lameijer, Elou S. Kingma
article en

Abstract

When assessing osteoarthritis, the congruency of articular surfaces and cartilage integrity are crucial. Static or dynamic CT scanning and subsequent bone-to-bone distance mapping enables a non-invasive evaluation of these factors. Distance maps visualize local inter-bone distances and its extent can serve as a representation of the contact surface area within a joint. A contact surface area can be defined by applying distance and angle thresholds between adjacent bones. These thresholds may affect the selected contact area and therefore influence distance measures. Several methods for distance map generation use different distance measurement approaches, with or without an angle threshold. The impact of the chosen method and thresholds remains unclear. This study evaluates the sensitivity to threshold settings of different methods in radioscaphoid, radiolunate, and scapholunate joints. Static 3D-CT scans of twenty healthy and eleven pathological wrists were analyzed. A mixed effect model was conducted to compare the sensitivity of different methods using particular angle and distance thresholds. The method combining perpendicular distance and angle thresholds was shown to be the least sensitive to changing threshold values, resulting in the smallest variations in observed contact surface area and bone-to-bone distances.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Health & Safety in Sports (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.