From Clinic to Grave: Women's experiences of ‘pregnancy remains’ disposal following an early miscarriage in England, UK

National guidance, particularly that issued by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA) informs UK clinical practices around managing pregnancy remains prior to 24 weeks gestation. This guidance stipulates that women should be offered options for disposal: cremation, burial, or incineration. Based on 20 months of ethnographic fieldwork between April 2020-September 2022 in one National Health Service (NHS) Trust in England, including participant observation, observing clinical consultations about pregnancy remains disposal (n28) and interviews with women (n27), this paper argues that current clinical practices appear discordant with the views of some women experiencing miscarriage and therefore are not conducive to inclusive care. Most women had not considered what would happen to the pregnancy remains prior to the formal discussion around disposal in the hospital and found the discussion unexpected. Many participants expressed disbelief about disposal pathways offered with most suggesting they were inappropriate, particularly given the early stage of their pregnancy (≤12-week gestation). Some women expected the pregnancy remains to be treated as clinical waste and were surprised and, at times, upset to not have this option. The research provides further evidence of the diversity of responses to miscarriage including some women's dissatisfaction with practices around pregnancy remains disposal. It shows that some women would prefer to have a choice that does not include ceremonial disposal. A person-centred approach to pregnancy remains disposal is recommended to accommodate a diverse range of attitudes. This should include incineration as a disposal option to ensure practices do not imply meaning of the pregnancy tissue that conflicts with women's perspectives, including their notions of foetal personhood or its absence. The study can inform and refine local and national practices as well as develop consistency across NHS Trusts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Science & Medicine
Published
2025-12-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118857
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Clinic to Grave: Women's experiences of ‘pregnancy remains’ disposal following an early miscarriage in England, UK

Susie Kilshaw
Social Science & Medicine
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

From Clinic to Grave: Women's experiences of ‘pregnancy remains’ disposal following an early miscarriage in England, UK

Susie Kilshaw
article en

Abstract

National guidance, particularly that issued by the Human Tissue Authority (HTA) informs UK clinical practices around managing pregnancy remains prior to 24 weeks gestation. This guidance stipulates that women should be offered options for disposal: cremation, burial, or incineration. Based on 20 months of ethnographic fieldwork between April 2020-September 2022 in one National Health Service (NHS) Trust in England, including participant observation, observing clinical consultations about pregnancy remains disposal (n28) and interviews with women (n27), this paper argues that current clinical practices appear discordant with the views of some women experiencing miscarriage and therefore are not conducive to inclusive care. Most women had not considered what would happen to the pregnancy remains prior to the formal discussion around disposal in the hospital and found the discussion unexpected. Many participants expressed disbelief about disposal pathways offered with most suggesting they were inappropriate, particularly given the early stage of their pregnancy (≤12-week gestation). Some women expected the pregnancy remains to be treated as clinical waste and were surprised and, at times, upset to not have this option. The research provides further evidence of the diversity of responses to miscarriage including some women's dissatisfaction with practices around pregnancy remains disposal. It shows that some women would prefer to have a choice that does not include ceremonial disposal. A person-centred approach to pregnancy remains disposal is recommended to accommodate a diverse range of attitudes. This should include incineration as a disposal option to ensure practices do not imply meaning of the pregnancy tissue that conflicts with women's perspectives, including their notions of foetal personhood or its absence. The study can inform and refine local and national practices as well as develop consistency across NHS Trusts.

Social Science & MedicineVol. 392
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.